Abstract:Rationale and Objectives Accurate and efficient estimation of patient height and weight is crucial to ensure patient safety and optimize the quality of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedures. Several height and weight estimation methods have been proposed for use in adult patient management, but none is widely established. Estimation by the medical technologists for radiology (MTR) based on personal experience remains to be the most common method. This study aimed to compare a novel deep learning (DL)-based 3-dimensional (3D) camera estimation method to MTR staff in terms of estimation accuracy. Methods A retrospective study was conducted to compare the accuracy of height and weight estimation with a DL-based 3D camera algorithm to the accuracy of height and weight estimation by the MTR. Depth images of the patients were captured during the regular imaging workflow on a low field 0.55 T MRI scanner (MAGNETOM Free.Max, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) and then processed retrospectively. Depth images of a total of 161 patients were used to validate the accuracy of the height and weight estimation algorithm. The accuracy of each estimation method was evaluated by computing the proportions of the estimates within 5% and 15% of actual height (PH05, PH15) and within 10% and 20% of actual weight (PW10, PW20). An acceptable accuracy for height estimation was predetermined to be PH05 = 95% and PH15 = 99% and an acceptable accuracy for weight estimation was predetermined to be PW10 = 70% and PW20 = 95%. The bias in height and weight estimation was measured by the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). Results The retrospective study included 161 adult patients. For 148/161 patients complying with inclusion criteria, DL-based 3D camera algorithm outperformed the MTR in estimating the patient's height and weight in term of accuracy (3D camera: PH05 = 98.6%, PH15 = 100%, PW10 = 85.1%, PW20 = 95.9%; MTR: PH05 = 92.5%, PH15 = 100%, PW10 = 75.0%, PW20 = 93.2%). MTR had a slightly higher bias in their estimates compared to the DL-based 3D camera algorithm (3D camera: MAPE height = 1.8%, MAPE weight = 5.6%, MTR: MAPE height = 2.2%, MAPE weight = 7.5%) Conclusion This study has demonstrated that the estimation of the patient's height and weight by a DL-based 3D camera algorithm is accurate and robust. It has the potential to complement the regular MRI workflows, by providing further automation during patient registration.

Estimating Body Weight From Measurements From Different Single-Slice Computed Tomography Levels: An Evaluation of Total Cross-Sectional Body Area Measurements and Deep Learning

Machine learning‐based estimation of patient body weight from radiation dose metrics in computed tomography

Estimating 3‐D whole‐body composition from a chest CT scan

Personalized computed tomography - Automated estimation of height and weight of a simulated digital twin using a 3D camera and artificial intelligence

Body Composition Analysis of Computed Tomography Scans in Clinical Populations: The Role of Deep Learning

Effects of contrast-medium and vertebral measurement level on computed tomography-based body composition parameters of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue

Towards visceral fat estimation at population scale: correlation of visceral adipose tissue assessment using three-dimensional cross-sectional imaging with BIA, DXA, and single-slice CT

Deep learning–based fully automated body composition analysis of thigh CT: comparison with DXA measurement

Deep Learning-based calculation of patient size and attenuation surrogates from localizer Image: Toward personalized chest CT protocol optimization

Evaluation of a fully automated computed tomography image segmentation method for fast and accurate body composition measurements

Automated vertebral bone mineral density measurement with phantomless internal calibration in chest LDCT scans using deep learning

Automatic deep learning method for third lumbar selection and body composition evaluation on CT scans of cancer patients

Evaluation of Effective Dose from CT Scans for Overweight and Obese Adult Patients Using the VirtualDose Software.

Validation study of a new semi-automated software program for CT body composition analysis

Fully-automated Body Composition Analysis in Routine CT Imaging Using 3D Semantic Segmentation Convolutional Neural Networks

Automated Patient Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Deep Learning-Based Height and Weight Estimation with 3D Camera: A Feasibility Study

Accuracy of Phantomless Calibration of Routine Computed Tomography Scans for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in the Spine Clinic

Effect of abdominal adipose content on spine phantom bone mineral density measured by rapid kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT and quantitative CT

Quantifying the effect of slice thickness, intravenous contrast and tube current on muscle segmentation: Implications for body composition analysis

External validation of a deep learning model for automatic segmentation of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue on abdominal computed tomography images

Body Weight Estimation Using Virtual Anthropometric Measurements from a Single Image