Abstract:Background: Despite advances in the medical management of Ulcerative Colitis (UC), surgery is required in about a third of patients. Aims and methods: A review of the literature of the last 20 years was conducted in order to analyze the results of Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis (IRA) and of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate UC. Postoperative complications, functional results and the risk of cancer were analyzed in each of the two groups of patients. Results: In IRA group postoperative morbidity is low, varying from 8 to 28%. The risk of urinary and sexual dysfunction are rare and fertility rates are higher, compared to IPAA. The cumulative probability of success (working IRA) is 84% at 5 years and 51-69% at 10 years. The postoperative morbidity of IPAA is higher; dehiscence and pelvic sepsis were observed respectively in 9.5% and in 5.5%. A sexual dysfunction is present in 3.4%. In 18.8% occurs pouchitis. The risk of failure of the pouch is 6.8% and increased to 8.5% after 5 years. The risk of cancer is higher after IRA than after IPAA, with a cumulative risk at 20 years of 6-14% and 4.2% respectively. Discussion: The choice between IPAA or IRA is based upon patient's preference and clinical criteria (malignancy or sphincter injury). IPAA, intervention of choice, is burdened by a higher rate of complications, such as anastomotic leak with pelvic sepsis and subsequent functional pouch failure, pouchitis, infertility in young women, lesions of the pelvic nerves and portal vein thrombosis. There have been reports of cancer not only in the anal transitional zone, but also in the same pouch, either after mucosectomy that after stapled anastomosis. IRA is less invasive than IPAA and postoperative complications are lower. Does not require dissection of the pelvic and presents no risk of injury of the nerves of the urogenital sphere. The long-term results of the IRA are generally satisfactory and most of the patients stated that after the intervention improve both the health status and quality of life. Conclusion: Today IPAA is the gold standard. The IRA is indicated in selected patients where they meet the following requirements: normal sphincter tone, absence of severe perineal disease, rectum does not actively involved by the disease, absence of dysplasia or cancer. It is also indicated in patients who refuse an ileostomy and it can be proposed as a possible interim procedure in young women, because it does not need a pelvic dissection and because the risk of infertility is minimal or absent when compared to IPAA. Because the risk of cancer is higher, patients undergoing IRA must be adequately informed about the risk, as well as recurrent proctitis, also of cancer, and must fully understand the need for surveillance and accept at least annual endoscopy with rectal biopsies; if these conditions are not met, patients should not be candidates for IRA. Key words: IPAA, IRA, Surgical treatment, Ulcerative Colitis.

Trends in surgical outcomes for Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis construction using a large nationwide database

Surgical Options for Appropriate Length of J-Pouch Construction for Better Outcomes and Long-term Quality of Life in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

Analysis on postoperative outcome of patients with ulcerative colitis after two- or three- stage laparoscopic total proctocolectomy plus ileal pouch anal anastomosis

National trends and outcomes of total proctocolectomy and completion proctectomy ileal pouch−anal anastomosis procedures for ulcerative colitis

Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients

Laparoscopic Surgery Contributes to a Decrease in Short-Term Complications in Surgical Ulcerative Colitis Patients During 2008-2017: a Multicenter Retrospective Study in China

Elective surgery for ulcerative colitis, ileo-rectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy An Update

Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience

Factors Associated With Performing Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis After Total Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis

The Natural History after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Population-Based Cohort Study from the United States

Evolution of laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: impact of enhanced recovery program, medication changes, and staged approaches on outcomes

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

State of the Art: Pouch Surgery in the 21st Century

P1126 Navigating the Future: Minimally Invasive Surgery Trends in Ulcerative Colitis

Transanal ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of short‐term outcomes

The impact of colectomy and restorative procedure on pouch function after ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. The icon fun study on behalf of the Italian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery (SICCR) Inflammatory Bowel Diseases committee

Long-term mental and physical quality of life outcomes following ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery

Quality of life and bowel function after laparoscopic proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis

P988 Preliminary report on short-term post-operative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic approach for restorative procto-colectomy with ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: a comparative study

Transanal proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (TaIPAA) for ulcerative colitis: medium term functional outcomes in a single centre

Risk Factors for Small Bowel Obstruction After Laparoscopic Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multivariate Analysis in Four Expert Centres in Europe