Abstract:Background: Despite advances in the medical management of Ulcerative Colitis (UC), surgery is required in about a third of patients. Aims and methods: A review of the literature of the last 20 years was conducted in order to analyze the results of Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis (IRA) and of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate UC. Postoperative complications, functional results and the risk of cancer were analyzed in each of the two groups of patients. Results: In IRA group postoperative morbidity is low, varying from 8 to 28%. The risk of urinary and sexual dysfunction are rare and fertility rates are higher, compared to IPAA. The cumulative probability of success (working IRA) is 84% at 5 years and 51-69% at 10 years. The postoperative morbidity of IPAA is higher; dehiscence and pelvic sepsis were observed respectively in 9.5% and in 5.5%. A sexual dysfunction is present in 3.4%. In 18.8% occurs pouchitis. The risk of failure of the pouch is 6.8% and increased to 8.5% after 5 years. The risk of cancer is higher after IRA than after IPAA, with a cumulative risk at 20 years of 6-14% and 4.2% respectively. Discussion: The choice between IPAA or IRA is based upon patient's preference and clinical criteria (malignancy or sphincter injury). IPAA, intervention of choice, is burdened by a higher rate of complications, such as anastomotic leak with pelvic sepsis and subsequent functional pouch failure, pouchitis, infertility in young women, lesions of the pelvic nerves and portal vein thrombosis. There have been reports of cancer not only in the anal transitional zone, but also in the same pouch, either after mucosectomy that after stapled anastomosis. IRA is less invasive than IPAA and postoperative complications are lower. Does not require dissection of the pelvic and presents no risk of injury of the nerves of the urogenital sphere. The long-term results of the IRA are generally satisfactory and most of the patients stated that after the intervention improve both the health status and quality of life. Conclusion: Today IPAA is the gold standard. The IRA is indicated in selected patients where they meet the following requirements: normal sphincter tone, absence of severe perineal disease, rectum does not actively involved by the disease, absence of dysplasia or cancer. It is also indicated in patients who refuse an ileostomy and it can be proposed as a possible interim procedure in young women, because it does not need a pelvic dissection and because the risk of infertility is minimal or absent when compared to IPAA. Because the risk of cancer is higher, patients undergoing IRA must be adequately informed about the risk, as well as recurrent proctitis, also of cancer, and must fully understand the need for surveillance and accept at least annual endoscopy with rectal biopsies; if these conditions are not met, patients should not be candidates for IRA. Key words: IPAA, IRA, Surgical treatment, Ulcerative Colitis.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

Surgical Options for Appropriate Length of J-Pouch Construction for Better Outcomes and Long-term Quality of Life in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients

Short- and Long-term Outcomes After Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review.

Stapled Anastomosis Versus Hand-Sewn Anastomosis With Mucosectomy for Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Postoperative Outcomes, Functional Outcomes, and Oncological Safety

Long-term mental and physical quality of life outcomes following ileal pouch anal anastomosis surgery

P924 Function and outcomes of ileal-pouch anal anastomosis in patients with connective tissue disorders

[Application of Ileal D-pouch Anal Anastomosis in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis].

Analysis on the Short-Term Complications of Total Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis in the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis and Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Transanal ileal pouch–anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of short‐term outcomes

Comparison of ileal D-pouch and J-pouch anal anastomosis for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis

Trends in surgical outcomes for Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis construction using a large nationwide database

Temporal changes in functional outcomes of stapled and hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis

Association between mucosectomy and endoscopic outcomes in patients with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis

The prevalence of pouch fistulas in ulcerative colitis following restorative proctocolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Does Ileoanal Pouch Surgery Increase the Risk of Desmoid in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis?

The fate of the ileal pouch in patients developing Crohn's disease

Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience

Laparoscopic-assisted Ileal Pouch-Rectal Muscle Sheath Anastomosis for the Treatment of Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

Ileal reservoir-associated complications in ulcerative colitis versus familial adenomatous polyposis: Impact on patient quality of life

Elective surgery for ulcerative colitis, ileo-rectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy An Update