Abstract:Background: Despite advances in the medical management of Ulcerative Colitis (UC), surgery is required in about a third of patients. Aims and methods: A review of the literature of the last 20 years was conducted in order to analyze the results of Ileo-Rectal Anastomosis (IRA) and of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis (IPAA) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate UC. Postoperative complications, functional results and the risk of cancer were analyzed in each of the two groups of patients. Results: In IRA group postoperative morbidity is low, varying from 8 to 28%. The risk of urinary and sexual dysfunction are rare and fertility rates are higher, compared to IPAA. The cumulative probability of success (working IRA) is 84% at 5 years and 51-69% at 10 years. The postoperative morbidity of IPAA is higher; dehiscence and pelvic sepsis were observed respectively in 9.5% and in 5.5%. A sexual dysfunction is present in 3.4%. In 18.8% occurs pouchitis. The risk of failure of the pouch is 6.8% and increased to 8.5% after 5 years. The risk of cancer is higher after IRA than after IPAA, with a cumulative risk at 20 years of 6-14% and 4.2% respectively. Discussion: The choice between IPAA or IRA is based upon patient's preference and clinical criteria (malignancy or sphincter injury). IPAA, intervention of choice, is burdened by a higher rate of complications, such as anastomotic leak with pelvic sepsis and subsequent functional pouch failure, pouchitis, infertility in young women, lesions of the pelvic nerves and portal vein thrombosis. There have been reports of cancer not only in the anal transitional zone, but also in the same pouch, either after mucosectomy that after stapled anastomosis. IRA is less invasive than IPAA and postoperative complications are lower. Does not require dissection of the pelvic and presents no risk of injury of the nerves of the urogenital sphere. The long-term results of the IRA are generally satisfactory and most of the patients stated that after the intervention improve both the health status and quality of life. Conclusion: Today IPAA is the gold standard. The IRA is indicated in selected patients where they meet the following requirements: normal sphincter tone, absence of severe perineal disease, rectum does not actively involved by the disease, absence of dysplasia or cancer. It is also indicated in patients who refuse an ileostomy and it can be proposed as a possible interim procedure in young women, because it does not need a pelvic dissection and because the risk of infertility is minimal or absent when compared to IPAA. Because the risk of cancer is higher, patients undergoing IRA must be adequately informed about the risk, as well as recurrent proctitis, also of cancer, and must fully understand the need for surveillance and accept at least annual endoscopy with rectal biopsies; if these conditions are not met, patients should not be candidates for IRA. Key words: IPAA, IRA, Surgical treatment, Ulcerative Colitis.

Factors Associated With Performing Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis After Total Colectomy for Ulcerative Colitis

Surgical Options for Appropriate Length of J-Pouch Construction for Better Outcomes and Long-term Quality of Life in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis

Analysis on postoperative outcome of patients with ulcerative colitis after two- or three- stage laparoscopic total proctocolectomy plus ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Trends in surgical outcomes for Ileal pouch–anal anastomosis construction using a large nationwide database

National trends and outcomes of total proctocolectomy and completion proctectomy ileal pouch−anal anastomosis procedures for ulcerative colitis

High but decreasing rates of reconstruction after total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis, and evidence of a direct volume outcome relationship

The fate of the ileal pouch in patients developing Crohn's disease

Association between mucosectomy and endoscopic outcomes in patients with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis

The Natural History after Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis: A Population-Based Cohort Study from the United States

The prevalence of pouch fistulas in ulcerative colitis following restorative proctocolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Pouchitis and Pouch-Related Complications in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

S1101 Surgical Outcomes Following an Episode of Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Single Center Cohort Study

Quality of life and bowel function after laparoscopic proctocolectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis

Results and complications after ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a meta-analysis of 43 observational studies comprising 9,317 patients

The impact of colectomy and restorative procedure on pouch function after ileo-pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis. The icon fun study on behalf of the Italian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery (SICCR) Inflammatory Bowel Diseases committee

Elective surgery for ulcerative colitis, ileo-rectal anastomosis or restorative proctocolectomy An Update

Occurrence of Crohn's disease in children after total colectomy for ulcerative colitis

Preoperative Clostridium difficile Infection Does Not Affect Pouch Outcomes in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Who Undergo Ileal Pouch-anal Anastomosis

US National Estimates of Contemporary Mortality Rates in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Undergoing Colectomy

P214 Effects of rectal stump proctitis on short-term postoperative complications after proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Ulcerative Colitis

The Surgical Management of Ileal Pouch Strictures