Abstract:The next step in our reductional analysis of GroEL was to study the activity of an isolated single seven-membered ring of the 14-mer. A known single-ring mutant, GroEL(SR1), contains four point mutations that prevent the formation of double-rings. That heptameric complex is functionally inactive because it is unable to release GroES. We found that the mutation E191G, which is responsible for the temperature sensitive (ts) Escherichia coli allele groEL44 and is located in the hinge region between the intermediate and apical domains of GroEL, appears to function by weakening the binding of GroES, without destabilizing the overall structure of GroEL44 mutant. We introduced, therefore, the mutation E191G into GroEL(SR1) in order to generate a single-ring mutant that may have weaker binding of GroES and hence be active. The new single-ring mutant, GroEL(SR44), was indeed effective in refolding both heat and dithiothreitol-denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase with great efficiency. Further, unlike all smaller constructs of GroEL, the expression of GroEL(SR44) in E. coli that contained no endogenous GroEL restored biological viability, but not as efficiently as does wild-type GroEL. We envisage the notional evolution of the structure and properties of GroEL. The minichaperone core acts as a primitive chaperone by providing a binding surface for denatured states that prevents their self-aggregation. The assembly of seven minichaperones into a ring then enhances substrate binding by introducing avidity. The acquisition of binding sites for ATP then allows the modulation of substrate binding by introducing the allosteric mechanism that causes cycling between strong and weak binding sites. This is accompanied by the acquisition by the heptamer of the binding of GroES, which functions as a lid to the central cavity and competes for peptide binding sites. Finally, dimerization of the heptamer enhances its biological activity.

[11] Construction of single-ring and two-ring hybrid versions of bacterial chaperonin GroEL

Creating the Functional Single-Ring GroEL-GroES Chaperonin Systems via Modulating GroEL-GroES Interaction

From Minichaperone to GroEL 3: Properties of an Active Single-ring Mutant of GroEL

GroEL Ring Separation and Exchange in the Chaperonin Reaction

The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex

GroEL/GroES: Structure and Function of a Two-Stroke Folding Machine

Characterisation of a GroEL single-ring mutant that supports growth of Escherichia coli and has GroES-dependent ATPase activity

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN GroEL-MEDIATED PROTEIN FOLDING

Multivalent Binding of Nonnative Substrate Proteins by the Chaperonin GroEL

Impact of bacterial chaperonin GroEL–GroES on bacteriorhodopsin folding and membrane integration

Reaction Cycle of Chaperonin GroEL via Symmetric “Football” Intermediate

Visualizing chaperonin function in situ by cryo-electron tomography

Chaperonin GroEL uses asymmetric and symmetric reaction cycles in response to the concentration of non-native substrate proteins

Essential Role of the Chaperonin Folding Compartment in Vivo.

Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex

Dynamic Complexes in the Chaperonin-Mediated Protein Folding Cycle

The versatile mutational “repertoire” of Escherichia coli GroEL, a multidomain chaperonin nanomachine

GroEL-Mediated Protein Folding: Making the Impossible, Possible

Monitoring Protein Conformation along the Pathway of Chaperonin-Assisted Folding

GroEL/GroES-Mediated Folding of a Protein Too Large to Be Encapsulated

Structural insights into thermophilic chaperonin complexes