Abstract:The original experiments reconstituting GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding were carried out under "nonpermissive" conditions, where the chaperonin system was absolutely required and substrate proteins could not achieve the native state if diluted directly from denaturant into solution. Under "permissive" conditions, however, employing lower substrate concentration and lower temperature, some substrate proteins can be refolded both by the chaperonin system and while free in solution. For several of these, the protein refolds more rapidly inside the GroEL-GroES cis chamber than free in solution, suggesting that the chamber may have an active role in assisting protein folding. Here, we observe that the difference is caused by reversible multimolecular association while folding in solution, an avenue of kinetic partitioning that slows the overall rate of renaturation relative to the chaperonin chamber, where such associations cannot occur. For Rubisco, reversible aggregation during folding in solution was observed by gel filtration. For a mutant of maltose-binding protein (DM-MBP), the rate of folding in solution declined with increasing concentration, and the folding reaction produced light scattering. Under solution conditions where chloride was absent, however, light scattering no longer occurred, and DM-MBP folded at the same rate as in the cis cavity. In a further test, dihydrofolate reductase, thermally inactivated in the cis cavity or in solution, was substantially reactivated upon temperature downshift in the cis cavity but not in solution, where aggregation occurred. We conclude that the GroEL-GroES chamber behaves as a passive "Anfinsen cage" whose primary role is to prevent multimolecular association during folding.

Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN GroEL-MEDIATED PROTEIN FOLDING

The reaction cycle of GroEL and GroES in chaperonin-assisted protein folding

GroEL/GroES: Structure and Function of a Two-Stroke Folding Machine

Chaperonin chamber accelerates protein folding through passive action of preventing aggregation

The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex

GroEL-Mediated Protein Folding: Making the Impossible, Possible

GroEL/ES chaperonin unfolds then encapsulates a nascent protein on the ribosome

GroEL/GroES-Mediated Folding of a Protein Too Large to Be Encapsulated

Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein

Protein folding: How the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics

Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage.

GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding

Visualizing chaperonin function in situ by cryo-electron tomography

GroEL and CCT are catalytic unfoldases mediating out-of-cage polypeptide refolding without ATP

Reaction Cycle of Chaperonin GroEL via Symmetric “Football” Intermediate

Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence

Protein folding in the cell: competing models of chaperonin function

Back to GroEL-Assisted Protein Folding: GroES Binding-Induced Displacement of Denatured Proteins from GroEL to Bulk Solution

Chaperones GroEL/GroES Accelerate the Refolding of a Multidomain Protein through Modulating On-pathway Intermediates

Impact of bacterial chaperonin GroEL–GroES on bacteriorhodopsin folding and membrane integration