Abstract:The next step in our reductional analysis of GroEL was to study the activity of an isolated single seven-membered ring of the 14-mer. A known single-ring mutant, GroEL(SR1), contains four point mutations that prevent the formation of double-rings. That heptameric complex is functionally inactive because it is unable to release GroES. We found that the mutation E191G, which is responsible for the temperature sensitive (ts) Escherichia coli allele groEL44 and is located in the hinge region between the intermediate and apical domains of GroEL, appears to function by weakening the binding of GroES, without destabilizing the overall structure of GroEL44 mutant. We introduced, therefore, the mutation E191G into GroEL(SR1) in order to generate a single-ring mutant that may have weaker binding of GroES and hence be active. The new single-ring mutant, GroEL(SR44), was indeed effective in refolding both heat and dithiothreitol-denatured mitochondrial malate dehydrogenase with great efficiency. Further, unlike all smaller constructs of GroEL, the expression of GroEL(SR44) in E. coli that contained no endogenous GroEL restored biological viability, but not as efficiently as does wild-type GroEL. We envisage the notional evolution of the structure and properties of GroEL. The minichaperone core acts as a primitive chaperone by providing a binding surface for denatured states that prevents their self-aggregation. The assembly of seven minichaperones into a ring then enhances substrate binding by introducing avidity. The acquisition of binding sites for ATP then allows the modulation of substrate binding by introducing the allosteric mechanism that causes cycling between strong and weak binding sites. This is accompanied by the acquisition by the heptamer of the binding of GroES, which functions as a lid to the central cavity and competes for peptide binding sites. Finally, dimerization of the heptamer enhances its biological activity.

GroEL/GroES-Mediated Folding of a Protein Too Large to Be Encapsulated

Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex

Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein

GroEL-Mediated Protein Folding: Making the Impossible, Possible

GroEL/GroES: Structure and Function of a Two-Stroke Folding Machine

GroEL and CCT are catalytic unfoldases mediating out-of-cage polypeptide refolding without ATP

GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding

Chaperonin-assisted folding of glutamine synthetase under nonpermissive conditions: off-pathway aggregation propensity does not determine the co-chaperonin requirement

Essential Role of the Chaperonin Folding Compartment in Vivo.

GroEL/ES chaperonin unfolds then encapsulates a nascent protein on the ribosome

Chaperonin chamber accelerates protein folding through passive action of preventing aggregation

Chaperones GroEL/GroES Accelerate the Refolding of a Multidomain Protein through Modulating On-pathway Intermediates

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN GroEL-MEDIATED PROTEIN FOLDING

The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex

Monitoring Protein Conformation along the Pathway of Chaperonin-Assisted Folding

Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage.

Active cage mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding demonstrated at single-molecule level

Visualizing chaperonin function in situ by cryo-electron tomography

Co-expression of chaperonin GroEL/GroES enhances in vivo folding of yeast mitochondrial aconitase and alters the growth characteristics of Escherichia coli

GroEL Mediates Protein Folding with a Two Successive Timer Mechanism

From Minichaperone to GroEL 3: Properties of an Active Single-ring Mutant of GroEL