Abstract:Angus (A) and Bos indicus (B; Brahman or Nellore) reciprocal backcross, embryo transfer calves, belonging to 28 full-sib families, were evaluated for differences in birth weight, gestation length, and weaning weight. Two methods were investigated; method I made no distinction between how the F(1) parents were produced, whereas method II distinguished between the 2 types of F(1) parents (AB vs. BA corresponding to A x B vs. B x A, respectively). Bos indicus backcross calves had a 4.3 d longer (P < 0.05) gestation length but did not differ in their average birth weight from A backcrosses. Among B backcrosses, B x F(1) calves had a 5.2 d longer (P = 0.01) gestation length than F(1) x B calves (290.5 vs. 285.3, respectively). Under method II analysis, there was a consistent trend for gestation length, in which BA F(1) parents produced calves that ranked greater than calves from AB F(1) parents, as sires and dams. Crosses with a greater proportion of B in the sire in relation to the amount in the dam had a heavier (P < 0.05) birth weight (F(1) x A and B x F(1); 38.1 and 38.4 kg, respectively) than their respective reciprocal crosses (A x F(1) and F(1) x B; 34.3 and 33.5 kg, respectively). The F(1) x A and B x F(1) crosses showed a large difference in birth weight between males and females (5.3 and 4.1 kg, respectively), whereas A x F(1) and F(1) x B crosses showed a small difference (P > 0.10) in birth weight between males and females (1.5 and 1.1 kg, respectively). Further examination within each sex showed a difference between male reciprocals that was generally much larger than that between female reciprocals. Calves with a greater percentage of B in the sire compared with the proportion in the dam ranked heavier for weaning weight as for birth weight, though these differences were not significant. In breeding systems involving B x Bos taurus crosses, even when using embryo transfer, not only does the breed composition of the calves affect their preweaning performance, but the particular cross that produces the calves also should be considered in making breeding decisions.

Elution of Pollen Antigens from Tannic Acid Treated Erythrocytes.∗

Chaperonin chamber accelerates protein folding through passive action of preventing aggregation

Chaperones GroEL/GroES Accelerate the Refolding of a Multidomain Protein through Modulating On-pathway Intermediates

GroEL/GroES-Mediated Folding of a Protein Too Large to Be Encapsulated

Chaperonin GroEL Reassembly: An Effect of Protein Ligands and Solvent Composition

Back to GroEL-Assisted Protein Folding: GroES Binding-Induced Displacement of Denatured Proteins from GroEL to Bulk Solution

GroEL/ES chaperonin unfolds then encapsulates a nascent protein on the ribosome

GroEL stimulates protein folding through forced unfolding

Toward a mechanism for GroEL.GroES chaperone activity: an ATPase-gated and -pulsed folding and annealing cage.

Protein folding in the central cavity of the GroEL–GroES chaperonin complex

Minichaperone (GroEL191-345) mediated folding of MalZ proceeds by binding and release of native and functional intermediates

Evaluation of reciprocal differences in Bos indicus x Bos taurus backcross calves produced through embryo transfer: I. Birth and weaning traits.

Chaperonin GroEL uses asymmetric and symmetric reaction cycles in response to the concentration of non-native substrate proteins

Protein folding: How the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics

GroEL and CCT are catalytic unfoldases mediating out-of-cage polypeptide refolding without ATP

Reconciling theories of chaperonin accelerated folding with experimental evidence

GroEL-Mediated Protein Folding: Making the Impossible, Possible

Nucleotide-Dependent Complex Formation between the Escherichia coli Chaperonins GroEL and GroES Studied under Equilibrium Conditions

The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex

GroEL/GroES: Structure and Function of a Two-Stroke Folding Machine

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN GroEL-MEDIATED PROTEIN FOLDING