Addressing Climate Change through International Investment Agreements: Obstacles and Reform Options

Sheng Zhang,Ni Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041471

IF: 3.9

2024-02-10

Sustainability

Abstract:The current international investment treaty network is not well suited to climate goals. The tension stems from the fact that "old generation" of international investment agreements were concluded before the widespread climate action and they were "climate neutral" or "climate blind". This study explores the obstacles for international investment agreements and investment arbitration to tackle climate change issues, indicating the need for reform. Despite the fact that some states have begun to reform their international investment agreements in light of climate change, there are still many shortcomings to be addressed. The current international investment agreement regime should be reformed to incorporate climate change considerations for investment arbitration to contribute to climate change mitigation. According to the findings, updating investment treaties based on a climate-oriented model would be a viable option for states.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the obstacles in international investment agreements (IIAs) in dealing with climate change and their reform options. Specifically, the paper explores the mismatch between the current international investment treaty network and climate goals, pointing out that most of the early international investment agreements were signed before extensive climate actions, so these agreements either paid insufficient attention to climate change or completely ignored this issue. As climate change has become a major global concern, many countries have begun to reform their international investment agreements to meet the needs of climate change, but there are still many deficiencies that need to be addressed.

The paper reveals that the current international investment agreement system may become an obstacle to the implementation of climate policies by analyzing three types of investment dispute cases in international investment arbitration, and proposes improvement plans. These three types of dispute cases include:

1. **Disputes related to the withdrawal of high - carbon industries**: Some countries have adopted climate policies to reduce carbon emissions, resulting in foreign investors filing for investment arbitration due to these regulatory measures violating investment protection clauses, such as illegal expropriation, national treatment and fair and equitable treatment clauses.
2. **Disputes arising from the modification or revocation of climate - related measures**: Many countries have formulated renewable energy incentive plans to attract foreign investment, but with the progress of technology and the reduction of costs, some countries have begun to modify or revoke these incentive policies, leading to investors filing for arbitration.
3. **Disputes arising from the host country's failure to fulfill its emission reduction commitments**: The host country is not only at risk of being sued due to taking climate measures, but may also cause disputes due to its failure to fulfill its emission reduction commitments under the Paris Agreement.

Finally, the paper proposes that effective global climate governance requires a large amount of capital investment in low - carbon sectors to promote industrial transformation, upgrading and technological progress. Through climate - oriented international investment agreement reform, cross - border investment from high - emission countries to low - emission countries can be promoted, accelerating the transition to a low - carbon economy. This will not only help countries better implement climate measures, but also provide important policy implications for government regulators, policy - makers and stakeholders.