Abstract:This panel was convened at 10:45 am, Friday, April 5, by its moderator, Wenhua Shan of Xi'an Jiaotong University, who introduced the panelists: Chen Fuli of the Ministry of Commerce, Embassy of China; Chen Huiping of the School of Law, Xiamen University; Mark Feldman of Peking University School of Transnational Law; and Won Kidane of Seattle University School of Law. * * Chen Fuli did not submit remarks for the Proceedings. REFLECTIONS ON CHINA-AFRICA BITS By Won Kidane ([dagger]) BACKGROUND The rise in the last decade of Chinese investment in Africa (1) continues to be a subject of curiosity. (2) Traditionally, the bulk of foreign investment flew North-South but rarely SouthSouth. (3) This is changing as China becomes an important player as a sender of foreign direct investment (FDI). In the 21st century, international investment agreements (IIAs), particularly bilateral investment treaties (BITs), have become the principal means of protection of foreign investment. (4) These investment treaties themselves lie along a spectrum representing the balance of power of their own era. Much like U.S. BITs, China's BITs are said to have gone through at least three generational modifications. (5) China has employed all three generations to protect its investment in Africa. Do China's BITs tell a story of a nation's rapid transformation from a recipient of FDI to a sender of FDI? Or do they paint a more complicated picture? China's approach to investment in Africa appears to be different from the approaches that Africa's traditional partners from Europe and North America have taken over the years. A 2010 UNCTAD report describes such difference in the following terms: [I]n contrast to Africa's relationship with traditional partners, the new partnerships ... often have established forums and dialogue platforms and are generally supported by frequent high-level official visits. Furthermore, they are based on the principle of noninterference in the internal affairs of partner countries. Consequently, they are not associated with policy conditionality as has been the case in relations with traditional partners. (6) The report states further that "[the] big Southern partners [mainly China] generally use official flows to promote trade and investment activities in Africa. Furthermore, Southern partners do not consider their financial contributions to other developing countries as aid. Rather they describe them as 'expressions of solidarity and cooperation borne out of shared experiences and sympathies.'" (7) Although the role of China's involvement in Africa remains a subject of great controversy and heated debate, (8) it is clear that Africa's recent and unprecedented growth is not entirely unrelated to Chinese investment and trade. (9) Be that as it may, China's economic interest in Africa is not all that different from Africa's traditional partners. Its means of pursuing the economic goals are also similar--although as Ambassador David Shinn puts it--China employs different tactics that might make it more acceptable to Africa. In his own words: [T]he United States and China use essentially the same political economic, military and cultural tools for implementing their relations with Africa. The emphasis the two sides place on these tactics, however, and the way they implement policy varies considerably. China presents itself more humbly in its interaction with Africa. Having served as the leader of the Western world since the end of the Second World War and the only superpower since the end of the Cold War, the United States often comes across in Africa as insensitive ... (10) The current China-Africa economic engagement is undoubtedly full of benefits and risks (11) arguably to both sides. The legal infrastructure for the management of such risks is in a state of development. …

Human Rights and International Investment Agreements: How to Bridge the Gap?

Balanced Investment Treaties and the BRICS

Recent Trends in Investment Arbitration on the Right to Regulate, Environment, Health and Corporate Social Responsibility: Too Much or Too Little?

Human Rights Conditionality and International Economic Relations:A Chinese Lawyer's Perspective

A Human Rights Focus to Upgrade China’s International Lending

The Human Rights Clause in the External Relations of the European Union

China-Us Bit Negotiations and the Future of Investment Treaty Regime: A Grand Bilateral Bargain with Multilateral Implications

China’s Stance on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Evolution, Challenges, and Reform Options

Reflections on the Human Rights View of Building a Community of a Shared Future for Mankind in the Perspectives of Institutionalization and the Belt and Road Initiative

Recent Developments in Investment and Labor Clause of 2012 U.S. Model BIT and China's Countermeasures

Addressing Climate Change through International Investment Agreements: Obstacles and Reform Options

International Investment and Indigenous Peoples’ Environment: A Survey of ISDS Cases from 2000 to 2020

Reductionist Intellectual Property Protection and Expansionist (and “Prodevelopment”) Competition Rules as a Human Rights Imperative? Enhancing Technology Transfer to the Global South

Investment Facilitation for Development and the Reform of International Investment Dispute Settlement Mechanism: The Choice of Developing Countries

International trade and investment law: a new framework for public health and the common good

Digital Trade Law and Human Rights

Regulations of Home and Host States on the Protection of Human Rights of Multinational Enterprises

China-Africa Investment Treaties and Dispute Settlement: A Piece of the Multipolar Puzzle

Contemporary Dilemmas of International Investment Law: from the Perspective of Settlement of International Investment Disputes

Is China Playing by the Rules? — Assessing China’s Reservations to International Human Rights Treaties

Integrating China's Intellectual Property Policies and Development Strategies