International environmental treaties: An honest or a misguided effort

Reza Hafezi,David A. Wood,Firouzeh Rosa Taghikhah
2024-04-11
Abstract:Climate change and environmental concerns represent a global crisis accompanied by significant economic challenges. Regular international conferences held to address these issues, such as in the UK (2021) and Egypt (2022), spark debate about the effectiveness and practicality of international commitments. This study examines international treaties from a different perspective, emphasizing the need to understand the power dynamics and stakeholder interests that delay logical actions to mitigate anthropogenic contributions to climate change and their impacts. Environmental and social concerns tend to increase within nations as their economies develop, where they fight to keep acceptable standards of living while reducing emissions volume. So, nations play disproportionate roles in global decision-making based on the size of their economies. Addressing climate change requires a paradigm shift to emphasize acknowledging and adhering to global commitments through civil pressure, rather than relying on traditional yet biased systems of international political diplomacy. Here, climate-friendly actions are evaluated and ideas to promote such activities are proposed. We introduce a "transition regime" as a solution to this metastasis challenge which gradually infects all nations.
General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses the effectiveness of international environmental treaties, particularly in addressing climate change achievements and shortcomings. The study points out that despite the signing of multiple treaties by countries, the actual impact is influenced by economic interests and power dynamics, resulting in delayed emission reduction actions. The author emphasizes the need to understand the interests and power imbalances of stakeholders, rather than solely relying on traditional political diplomacy. The paper raises a key question: whether international environmental agreements have truly achieved their goals or if economic interests have ultimately undermined their success. Research indicates that a country's role in decision-making is proportional to its economic size, with developed countries often playing disproportionate roles in efforts to mitigate climate change. The author advocates for compliance with global commitments through citizen pressure, rather than relying on biased political systems. The paper also discusses conflicts of interest, particularly the differing positions of developed and developing countries in negotiations. The author suggests the use of a "transitional regime" as a solution, to address climate change challenges faced by all countries in a gradual manner. They believe that climate-friendly actions should be promoted through pressure from civil society and propose the implementation of carbon pricing, institutional reforms to strengthen the power of environmental organizations, and support for grassroots organizations committed to environmental sustainability. Furthermore, the paper mentions the temporal inconsistency of political decision-making and the impact of consumerism on the environment. Short-term economic considerations often take priority over long-term environmental and social welfare, and changes in consumer behavior are necessary but face challenges. The author calls for educating the public, raising awareness of sustainability and environmental protection, and encouraging sustainable consumption patterns. Overall, this paper aims to analyze the limitations of international environmental treaties and proposes more effective responses to climate change and environmental crises through citizen participation and transformative mechanisms.