Abstract:Background: Self-reported substance use is more likely to be influenced by underreporting bias compared to the biological markers. Underreporting bias or validity of self-reported substance use depends on the study population and cannot be generalized to the entire population. This study aimed to compare the validity of self-reported substance use between research setting and primary health care setting from the same source population. Methods and materials: The population in this study included from Rafsanjan Youth Cohort Study (RYCS) and from primary care health centers. The sample from RYCS is made up 607 participants, 113 (18.62%) women and 494 (81.38%) men and sample from PHC centers is made up 522 individuals including 252 (48.28%) women and 270 (51.72%) men. We compared two groups in respect of prevalence estimates based on self-reported substance use and urine test. Then for evaluating validity of self-reported substance use in both group, the results of reference standard, urine tests, were compared with the results of self-reported drug use using measures of concordance. Results: The prevalence of substance use based on urine test was significantly higher in both settings compared to self-reported substance use over the past 72 h. The sensitivity of self-report substance use over the past 72 h in research setting was 39.4, 20, 10% and zero for opium, methadone, cannabis and amphetamine, respectively and in primary health care setting was 50, 20.7, 12.5% and zero for opium, methadone, cannabis and amphetamine, respectively. The level of agreement between self-reported substance use over the past 72 h and urine test indicated fair and moderate agreement for opium in both research and primary health care settings, respectively and also slight agreement for methadone and cannabis in both settings were reported. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of self-reported substance use. For all substances, the level of agreement increased with longer recall periods. The specificity of self-report for all substances in both groups was more than 99%. Conclusion: Individuals in primary health care setting were more likely to self-reported substance use than in research setting, but setting did not have a statistically significant effect in terms of self-reported substance use. Programs that rely on self-reported substance use may not estimate the exact prevalence of substance use in both research and primary health care settings, especially for substances that have a higher social stigma. Therefore, it is recommended that self-report and biological indicators be used for more accurate evaluation in substance use studies. It is also suggested that future epidemiological studies be performed to reduce bias of social desirability and find a method providing the highest level of privacy.

Characteristics of self introduced addicts in Ardebil

Characterization of narcotic drug abusers visited in Ardebil self referred centers

Exploring the Demographic Factors and Facilitators to Addiction Abstinence

Clinical Analysis of opium abuse in period of time 1998 and 2006

Iranian Common Attitude Toward Opium Consumption

Changes in serum biochemical factors associated with opium addiction after addiction desertion

The relationship between beliefs in substance craving and quality of life among narcotics anonymous: a cross-sectional study in southeastern Iran

Clinical Characteristics Of Poly-Drug Abuse Among Heroin Dependents And Association With Other Psychopathology In Compulsory Isolation Treatment Settings In China

Profiles of Psychiatric Disorders among Heroin Dependent Individuals in Changsha, China.

A Pilot Study of Life Events and Mood Disorders: Self-Report Survey in Chinese Heroin-Dependent Individuals.

Socio-demographic and clinical profile of opoid users

Barriers to Quitting Addiction in Iranian Women: A Qualitative Study

Oral health status and its determinants among opiate dependents: a cross-sectional study

Survey on the Related Factors of 100 Heroin Addicts in Taiyuan City

Comparison Between Family Function Dimensions and Quality of Life Among Amphetamine Addicts and Non- Addicts

Validity of self-reported substance use: research setting versus primary health care setting

Characteristics of Psychopathology and the Relationship Between Routes of Drug Administration and Psychiatric Symptoms in Heroin Addicts

Surveying the Effect of Opioid Abuse on the Extent of Coronary Artery Diseases in Diabetic Patients

The pattern of substance use disorder in the United Arab Emirates in 2015: results of a National Rehabilitation Centre cohort study

The evolution of addiction treatment and harm reduction programs in Iran: a chaotic response or a synergistic diversity?