Erratum: Direct Mechanical Detection and Measurement of Wave-Matter Orbital Angular Momentum Transfer by Nondissipative Vortex Mode Conversion ]

B. Sanchez-Padilla,L. Jonusauskas,M. Malinauskas,R. Wunenburger,and E. Brasselet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.132.079902
IF: 8.6
2024-02-15
Physical Review Letters
Abstract:Received 4 January 2024 © 2024 American Physical Society Physics Subject Headings (PhySH) Research Areas Acoustic wave phenomenaMechanical effects of light on material media General Physics
physics, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper is an erratum, aiming to correct some mistakes in the original paper. Specifically, this paper attempts to solve the following problems: 1. **Correction of simulated data**: - Figure 2 in the original paper shows the relationship between the distance \(d\) between the spiral mirror and the transducer, the intercepted power \(P\), and the intercepted power \(P_0\) of the reflected field. These data were simulated in the original paper using a flat circular transducer with a diameter of 10 mm, but in fact, the transducer used had a diameter of 8 mm and a 1 - mm - diameter hole on the axis. Therefore, these simulated data need to be corrected. 2. **Acoustic absorption effect in air**: - The residual acoustic absorption effect in air mentioned in the original paper was not considered in the simulation. The corrected simulation data need to include this factor. 3. **Correction of formula errors**: - There was a formula error in the original paper. That is, \(P=\frac{mg c_0}{2} = 7.5\times 10^{-3}\text{mW}\) should be corrected to \(P=\frac{mg c_0\left(\frac{R}{R_0}\right)^2}{2}=7.5\times 10^{-3}\text{mW}\). Through these corrections, the author hopes to ensure the self - consistency of the experimental results and the accuracy of the discussion. In particular, the corrected data will not change the rationality of choosing \(d = 100\text{mm}\) in the experiment, nor will it affect the neglect of the secondary reflection effect. Moreover, the corrected charts (Figure 1(c) and 1(d)) have no substantial impact on the results and discussion of the original paper.