Abstract:Objective Aim In collaborating nurse educators from different Chinese communities, this study aimed to test the validity and reliability of a Chinese version of critical thinking disposition inventory (CTDI CV), which has conceptual equivalence with the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI), and at the same time is culturally sensitive to be applied in Chinese speaking students.Method The study comprised two phases. The first phase was focus group interviews and expert panel review for establishing the content validity of CTDI CV. The second phase was questionnaire survey, for testing CTDI CV's comprehensibility and reliability, and establishing the normative index of disposition toward critical thinking of nursing students in different Chinese communities. Two rounds of questionnaires were conducted. The first round involved 460 students from five Chinese cities. And the second round had 1829 students from six Chinese cities.Results CTDI CV is adopted from CCTDI, which conceptualizes the constituents of CT disposition in seven aspects. They are truth seeking, open mindedness, inquisitiveness, analyticity, systematicity, critical thinking self confidence, and cognitive maturity. CTDI CV has three major modifications. First, the item wordings were selected from the focus interview verbatim transcriptions. This is to ensure that the language used is comprehensible by students at high school level. Second, 16 items were contextualized by adding a hypothetical situation or by accommodating the Chinese cultural norms that takes modesty as a virtue in the item descriptions. Third, CTDI CV simplifies the scoring formula of CCTDI, but retaining the same subscale and total scoring points. The overall CVI was 0.89 , with the subscale CVI ranging from 0.6 to 1. The overall alpha was 0.90. Subscale alphas ranged between 0.54 and 0.77. These readings show satisfactory content validity and internal consistency. The total CTDI CV score was 287.89, and five subscale scores were 40. The Chinese students showed overall positive critical thinking disposition except in the aspects of truth seeking and systematicity.Conclusion CTDI CV is instrumental to help students reflect on their own critical thinking capabilities. The results are indicative for teachers to design learning activities for enhancing students' critical thinking, and to evaluate the effect of such teaching activities.

The Development of Cognitive Reflection in China

Does the Cognitive Reflection Test Work with Chinese College Students? Evidence from a Time-Limited Study

Contextual and Cultural Differences in Positive Thinking

Control Deprivation and Styles of Thinking

Children's cognitive reflection predicts successful interpretations of covariation data

The Influence of Critical Thinking on Chinese Innovative Concept and Behavior

Why does traditional China education system place less importance on critical thinking than western system? An evaluation of how to implement critical thinking in Chinese education effectively

The Chinese Brief Cognitive Test: Normative Data Stratified by Gender, Age and Education

Early Critical Thinking in a Mandarin-Speaking Child: An Exploratory Case Study

Adapting or Adopting? Critical Thinking Education in the East Asian Cultural Sphere: A Systematic Integrative Review

Development and Validation of the Chinese Critical Thinking Disposition Scale among Foreign Language Students

The Investigation of critical thinking disposition among Chinese primary and middle school students

Chinese Students' Conservative Learning Behavior in Classroom and Its relationship with Mean thinking and Critical Thinking

Validity and reliability of the Chinese critical thinking disposition inventory

Conceptions and Practices of Critical Thinking in Chinese Schools: An Example from Shanghai

Development and validation of Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory for Chinese medical college students (CTDI-M)

Fostering Creativity and Critical Thinking in College: A Cross-Cultural Investigation

Sociocultural Patterning of Neural Activity During Self-Reflection.

Identifying Cultural Differences in Metacognition

Metacognitive Effort Regulation across Cultures