Abstract:Despite large literature on Cross-Cultural Competence (3C) there is a gap in understanding learning processes and mechanisms by which people arrive at successful 3C. We present a novel perspective for 3C learning and decision-making in innovative assessment contexts. We use Mindset theory (i.e., believing ability is fixed or changeable) because it is shown to be a powerful motivator for general learning and performance and in cross-cultural contexts. We propose the notion of cultural mindsets – beliefs, affect, and cognition that govern how people adapt, learn, and update cultural information. To understand how cultural mindset affects learning and performance, we apply computational cognitive modeling using Markov decision process (MDP). Using logfile data from an interactive 3C task, we operationalize behavioral differences in actions and decision making based on Mindset theory, developing cognitive models of fixed and malleable cultural mindsets based on mechanisms of initial beliefs, goals, and belief updating. To explore the validity of our theory, we develop computational MDP models, generate simulated data, and examine whether performance patterns fit our expectations. We expected the malleable cultural mindset would be better at learning the cultural norms in the assessment, more persistent in cultural interactions, quit less before accomplishing the task goal, and would be more likely to modify behavior after negative feedback. We find evidence of distinct patterns of cultural learning, decision-making, and performance with more malleable cultural mindsets showing significantly greater cultural learning, persistence, and responsiveness to feedback, and more openness to exploring current cultural norms and behavior. Moreover, our model was supported in that we were able to accurately classify 83% of the simulated records from the generating model. We argue that cultural mindsets are important mechanisms involved in effectively navigating cross-cultural situations and should be considered in a variety of areas of future research including education, business, health, and military institutions.

Identifying Cultural Differences in Metacognition

Contextual and Cultural Differences in Positive Thinking

Metacognitive Effort Regulation across Cultures

Cultural Differences in Opportunity Cost Consideration.

Cultural Differences in Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Believing

Evidence for a Cultural Mindset: Combining Process Data, Theory, and Simulation

Cross-cultural Differences in Adult Theory of Mind Abilities: A Comparison of Native-English Speakers and Native-Chinese Speakers on the Self/Other Differentiation Task.

Elucidating the underlying components of metacognitive systematic bias in the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and inferior parietal cortex

Cultural Influences on the Processing of Social Comparison Feedback Signals—an ERP Study

Normative data and standardization of an international protocol for the evaluation of metacognition in Spanish-speaking university students: A cross-cultural analysis

Cultural effects on mindreading

Knowing whom to learn from: individual differences in metacognition and weighting of social information

Sociocultural Patterning of Neural Activity During Self-Reflection.

Cross-Cultural Theory of Mind: Self/Other Differentiation in Individualist Versus Collectivist Cultures.

Cultural Differences In Thinking Styles

Moderating Role of Creative Mindset in the Effect of Metacognitive Experience on Insight Problem Solving

Cortical thickness and metacognition in cognitively diverse older adults.

Cultural Differences in Inhibitory Control: An ALE Meta-Analysis

Principles for Adapting Assessments of Executive Function across Cultural Contexts

Cultural Influences on Social Feedback Processing of Character Traits

The neural representation of metacognition in preferential decision‐making