Abstract:Digitalization has expanded the scope of citizen participation. Nevertheless, there are no conclusive findings on online citizen participation and inclusive policymaking. This study adds in line with the discussion with a fresh perspective of institutional bias. It presents new evidence by examining the process, participants, policy agenda, and sentiments of public opinions from the government-led and Internet-empowered citizen participation regarding the 2017–2035 Shanghai Master Plan. Four findings are reported based on the in-depth case study with text and sentiment analysis. First, the government-led model provides institutionalized opportunities for citizen engagement throughout the policy process, while the Internet-empowered citizen participation is characterized by contingency and ad hoc. Second, the government-led model remains elite-dominated, while the Internet empowers a wider scope of stakeholders with an open and popularized participation platform. Third, the public opinion from the Internet-empowered model often goes beyond or even against the pre-defined official principles and goals. In contrast, the civic discussion in the government-led model influences policy by changing the sequence of policy agenda or providing focus within the official setting. Fourth, citizens, especially the experts, are more likely to give positive feedback in the government-led model than the Internet-empowered approach. These findings confirm and identify the remaining institutional bias that hinders inclusive policymaking in the Internet age. Theoretically, it reminds scholars to examine the institutional arrangements regarding citizen participation carefully. Practically, it indicates that the central government could facilitate inclusive policymaking at the local level by reducing the institutional bias of the government-led approach and utilizing text and sentiment analysis to urge the local government's response to Internet-empowered public opinion.

A Comparative Analysis of Public Participation Approaches in Environmental Decision-Making in Western Countries

The Role of Public Participation in Environmental Governance: Empirical Evidence from China

Public Participation in Environmental Management in China: Status Quo and Mode Innovation

Public Participation Modes in China's Environmental Impact Assessment Process: an Analytical Framework Based on Participation Extent and Conflict Level

The influence of public awareness on public participation in environmental governance: Empirical evidence in China

Effectiveness Research on Public Participation in Environmental Governance Based on P-S-A Three-tier Model

How to Enhance Public Participation in Environmental Governance? Evidence from China

The Effective Decision Model Of Public Participation In Urban Renewal

Comparative Analysis of Political Participation in Chinese and Western Democratic Theories

Does public participation promote environmental efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of environmental information disclosure in China

Models and Principles of Public Policy Participation

Public Participation in China’s Water Governance

How can public participation improve environmental governance in China? A policy simulation approach with multi-player evolutionary game

Mediating and spatial spillover effects of public participation in environmental pollution governance mediated via traditional and new media

Citizen Participation and Government Accountability: National-Scale Experimental Evidence from Pollution Appeals in China

Does Public Participation Reduce Regional Carbon Emissions? A Quasi-Natural Experiment from Environmental Information Disclosure in China

Government-led and Internet-empowered Citizen Participation in China's Policymaking: A Case Study of the Shanghai 2035 Master Plan.

Study on Public Participation Mechanism in Basin Water Pollution Control

Effects of public participation on environmental governance in China: A spatial Durbin econometric analysis

The Missing Piece of the Puzzle: How Different Water-related Public Concerns Contribute to Water Governance in China

Community Environmental Roundtable Meeting: A New Model of Public Participation in Environmental Protection