Abstract:BackgroundPotassium is one of the most sensitive analytes to in-vitro hemolysis. To detect this error, modern clinical chemistry analyzers calculate the hemolysis index (HI) to estimate the degree of specimen hemolysis. Recently, Roche Diagnostics lowered the acceptable potassium HI limit from 100 to 20 and recommended laboratories avoid using specimens with an HI>20. The goal of this study was to determine a clinically acceptable HI cut-off for potassium at our community reference laboratory, relying on patient data from routine laboratory operation.MethodsPlasma venous potassium, sodium, and HI test results from community patients measured on Roche cobas 8000 ISE and c701 modules between September 2022 to December 2023 were extracted from the Roche Infinity Middleware (n=1,101,897). Data was divided into groups based on HI which ranged from 0 to 300. The sample pool with the lowest level of hemolysis (HI≤10) was defined as the base group. Mean and standard deviation of potassium for each HI group was calculated and the difference in the mean between each group compared to the base group was calculated as both absolute and percent ΔK. Percent changes in critical values for both potassium and sodium as a function of hemolysis were calculated for each HI group. Measurement uncertainty (MU) for potassium was calculated using a top-down approach. Data were analyzed in Rstudio and Microsoft Excel.ResultsThe vast majority of potassium specimens (83.8%) were stratified into the HI base group (HI ≤10) and 96.8 % had an HI ≤ 20, the cut-off recommended by Roche. The mean potassium level for each HI group increased as the degree of hemolysis in the specimens became more elevated. A MU-derived analytically significant shift of ΔK>0.1 mmol/L was observed for the bin HI 21-30. Depending on the employed total allowable error limit, clinically significant shifts in mean potassium levels were observed at HI bin 41-50 (RCPA: ΔK>0.2 mmol/L) or HI bin 101-150 (EFLM-derived reference change value: ΔK>10.1% and CLIA: ΔK>0.5mmol/L. The shift in patient potassium values seen as HI increased led to a change in critical results reporting frequencies. In the base group (HI≤10), 0.06% and 0.07% of results had low ( 6.2 mmol/L) critical potassium values, respectively. When HI was 101-300, 0.00 and 15.7% of results had low or high critical potassium values. A similar comparison performed with sodium did not show the same shift in reported critical values. Linear regression of ΔK plotted vs HI produced the equation ΔK=0.0051xHI, validating the equation of Martinez-Morillo and Alvarez published previously using paired hemolyzed/non-hemolyzed potassium laboratory data.ConclusionsIn community patients, in-vitro hemolysis produced analytically significant errors at an HI of 20. Clinically significant errors occurred between an HI of 40-100. Past HI 100, mean ΔKs of 0.5-1.20 mmol/L were seen in our population. This shift in patient values as a function of hemolysis led to a change in critical result reporting, suggesting the generation of both factious critically high potassium results and the masking of critically low potassium results in our patient population.

Errors in Acid-Base Titration Using Gran’s Plot Method

Analysis of the Endpoint Error in Acid-base Titration

Research on Direct and Accurate Titration of Strong Acid Strong-Weak Acid Mixture

Rapid Estimation for Titration Error Based on Acid-Base Titration Curve Plotted with CurTiPot

A New Titration Method Based on Concentration-Variable Patterns. Principles and Applications to Acid-Base and Redox Titrations.

Errors Analysis on Controlled Potential Titration

Batch-to-batch reproducibility for the primary pH method for the example of NMIJ carbonate buffer solutions

Equivalence‐point Electromigration Acid–base Titration Via Moving Neutralization Boundary Electrophoresis

B-127 The Effect of Hemolysis on Potassium Measurement in a Community Setting: The Marching Error

Concentration Limits for Accurate Titrations of Monoprotic Acids

[Monitoring the Stoichiometric Relation of Ammonium Oxidation with the Titrimetry of Hydrogen Ion Variation].

Titration in Canonical and Grand-Canonical Ensembles

DETERMINATION OF FREE ACID IN HIGH LEVEL LIQUID WASTES BY MEANS OF FIXED Ph VALUE

A Tool for Automatic Correction of Endogenous Concentrations: Application to BHB Analysis by LC-MS-MS and GC-MS

A-101 Is That Unexpected? Education on Handling Real World Complications with Tightly Controlled Analytes During Method Evaluation

Re-Examination of Plotting Analytical Response Against Different Forms of Concentration

Comparison of Orthogonal Determination Methods of Acid/Base Constants with Meta-Analysis

Understanding the Source of Error in First-Principles-Based Micro-Kinetic Modeling: Density Functional Theory Calculations Versus the Mean-Field Approximation

“Why Not Stoichiometry” versus “Stoichiometry—Why Not?” Part III: Extension of GATES/GEB on Complex Dynamic Redox Systems

A Discussion on the Affecting Factors of the Fitting Procedures' Reliability in Isothermal Titration Calorimetry Analysis.

Evaluation for analytical performance of three conventional methods for determination of total plasma carbon dioxide