Accurate quantitative gas chromatographic analysis Part 1: Methods of calculating results

D. R. Deans
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02255478
1968-05-01
Chromatographia
Abstract:The main sources of error in chromatographic analysis are described, particular attention being drawn to variable bias. This is one of the major potential sources as it is not easily detected. A comparison is made between the charateristics of the three basic methods of calculating results, normalization, constant volume injection, and internal standard. Despite its popularity normalization has many disadvantages and the presentation of results as ratios of compounds to one another is suggested in preference to normalization.Experimental evidence is given to demonstrate that no commercial chromatograph tested gives relative response factors within acceptable limits of published data and that no commercial flame ionisation detectors are truly linear over much of their range. Calibration of individual chromatographs with synthetic mixtures covering the range of concentrations expected is advocated as being the best way to obtain accurate results. If individual calibration is used, the use of peak area as the measure of peak size is not essential, and experimental evidence is given to show that better repeatability is obtained from peak height measurement than from peak area measurement.
chemistry, analytical,biochemical research methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?