Do we need to develop a more relevant conservation literature?

EJ Milner-Gulland, Martin Fisher, Stephen Browne, Kent H Redford, Marjorie Spencer, William J Sutherland

2010-01-01

Abstract:The rationale of conservation science is to provide a scientific basis for conservation action but this can only occur if conservation management is actually influenced by this science and if the science provides answers to managementrelevant questions. One of the main roles of conservation journals is to provide this scientific foundation. However, many commentators have highlighted the missing link between research published in these journals and management decisions (eg Sutherland et al., 2004): the stereotype is of conservation practitioners basing their actions on personal experience and anecdote whilst scientists talk only amongst themselves about their published articles. Do we, therefore, need to develop a more relevant literature to ensure that conservation science does actually form the basis for conservation practice? The question comes from both sides—how can the knowledge and understanding …