Abstract:To increase their conservation value, future non‐lethal nest protection experiments should whenever possible clearly state overall aims, take place over multiple seasons, use a comparable control and test non‐lethal protection methods independently of lethal predator control. Greater focus is required on under‐studied taxa such as cup‐nesting songbirds and birds in South America, Africa and Asia, and novel protection techniques such as deterrents and chemical camouflage. Practitioners should consider the evidence we synthesise here when deciding whether non‐lethal nest protection approaches are optimal for their study system, to increase conservation success and reduce ethical and financial costs. Implementing effective, affordable and ethical conservation management will be crucial for minimising future biodiversity losses. Such management requires reliable foundational evidence to help managers make informed choices about how to address the needs of their target species. Unfortunately, such evidence is still lacking for many species and management scenarios. One major global challenge is improving the reproductive success of threatened species in the context of predation. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of in situ experiments that used non‐lethal methods to protect bird nests against predators, with the aims of summarising global trends in nest protection efforts, comparing the effectiveness of different protection measures and informing future research and management. We considered peer‐reviewed studies in English. We detected a large geographic and taxonomic bias in the evidence base with 58% of articles conducted in North America and 76% on ground‐nesting birds. Less than 3% of articles involved taxa listed as Endangered or Critically Endangered and 51% of study units lasted just a single breeding season. Nests protected with exclosures, fences and guards were more likely to be successful than their unprotected controls. Interventions involving deterrents, conditioned taste aversion, chemical camouflage and diversionary feeding did not have a significant positive effect on nest success, but the interventions in these categories were less common and more diverse in nature. Synthesis and applications. To increase their conservation value, future non‐lethal nest protection experiments should whenever possible clearly state overall aims, take place over multiple seasons, use a comparable control and test non‐lethal protection methods independently of lethal predator control. Greater focus is required on under‐studied taxa such as cup‐nesting songbirds and birds in South America, Africa and Asia, and novel protection techniques such as deterrents and chemical camouflage. Practitioners should consider the evidence we synthesise here when deciding whether non‐lethal nest protection approaches are optimal for their study system, to increase conservation success and reduce ethical and financial costs.

Current perspectives in avian nutrition: domestic animal models and their role in conservation management

Research advances of Galliformes since 1990 and future prospects

Impacts of coprophagic foraging behaviour on the avian gut microbiome

The avian gut microbiota: Diversity, influencing factors, and future directions

The crucial contribution of veterinarians to conservation biology

Bird traits and their nutrient impact on terrestrial invertebrate populations

Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies

Enhancing Conservation Strategies for Wild and Migratory Bird Habitats in South Asia: A Comprehensive Review

Review: Current challenges in poultry nutrition, health, and welfare

Long-term anthropogenic drivers of diet composition and niche breadth in an endangered avian scavenger: The scant role of sanitary regulations

The influence of diet on gut microbiome and body mass dynamics in a capital-breeding migratory bird

Advancements in Animal Nutrition an Insights from Veterinary Science

Protecting wild bird nests against predators: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of non‐lethal methods

A brief review on models for birds exposed to chemicals

Parrot Dietary Habits and Consumption of Alternate Foodstuffs

Citizen science observations shed light on how anthropogenic food sources influence wildlife disease

Covariation of the Fecal Microbiome with Diet in Nonpasserine Birds

Advancing Genetic Methods in the Study of Parrot Biology and Conservation

Using animal behavior in conservation management: a series of systematic reviews and maps

Household Factors Influencing Participation in Bird Feeding Activity: A National Scale Analysis

Supporting bird diversity and ecological function in managed grassland and forest systems needs an integrative approach