In Vitro Study on the Influence of the Buccal Surface Convexity of the Tooth upon Enamel Loss after Bracket Removal

Sandra Pallarés-Serrano,Alba Pallarés-Serrano,Antonio Pallarés-Serrano,Antonio Pallarés-Sabater
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17071519
IF: 3.4
2024-03-28
Materials
Abstract:Polishing after the removal of brackets is the final step in orthodontic treatment. It is simple to perform, though some studies have reported that polishing causes damage to the enamel surface. An in vitro study was made of the influence of the buccal surface convexity of the tooth upon possible enamel loss when the remaining resin and adhesive are removed after bracket decementing using two different polishing modes: a tungsten carbide bur at low and high speeds. The convexity of the buccal surface was quantified in 30 incisors and 30 premolars. A stereoscopic microscope was used to obtain photographs of the profile of the crown, and Image J software was used to calculate convexity by dividing the length of a line from the cementoenamel junction to the incisal margin by another line from the mentioned junction to the maximum convexity of the buccal surface. Brackets were cemented on all the teeth and were decemented 24 h later. In both groups, the residual composite was removed with a tungsten carbide bur at a low speed in one-half of the teeth and at a high speed in the other half. The buccal surface of each tooth was then photographed again, and the convexity was calculated and compared against the baseline value. The difference between the two values were taken to represent the enamel loss. The convexity of the premolars was significantly greater than that of the incisors, but this did not result in greater enamel loss when the same polishing mode was used. However, the tungsten carbide bur at a high speed proved more aggressive, causing significantly greater enamel loss than when used at a low speed.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve This paper aims to explore the impact of buccal surface convexity on enamel loss after bracket removal. Specifically, the study evaluates the effect of buccal surface convexity on enamel loss during the removal of residual resin and adhesive using two different grinding methods (low-speed and high-speed tungsten carbide burs) through in vitro experiments. ### Research Background and Motivation 1. **Grinding Steps After Bracket Removal**: - Bracket removal is the final step in orthodontic treatment, requiring the removal of residual adhesive and composite material from the tooth surface. - Although this step is simple and easy to perform, existing studies have shown that grinding may cause damage to the enamel. 2. **Importance of Enamel Protection**: - Enamel is a non-renewable tissue, making its protection particularly important. - If residual material is not completely removed, it may form areas of bacterial accumulation, leading to demineralization and carious lesions, thereby affecting the aesthetics and integrity of the teeth. 3. **Limitations of Existing Research**: - Most studies focus on evaluating qualitative indicators such as enamel surface roughness and adhesive remnant index. - Few studies consider the impact of buccal surface convexity on enamel loss, despite this anatomical difference potentially having a significant impact on the results. ### Research Objectives - **Evaluate the Impact of Buccal Surface Convexity on Enamel Loss**: - By quantifying the convexity of the buccal surface, the study investigates the differences in enamel loss at different grinding speeds (low-speed and high-speed). - Compare enamel loss in different types of teeth (incisors and premolars) under the same grinding mode. - **Test Hypotheses**: - Hypothesis 1: The initial convexity of the buccal surface will not affect enamel loss. - Hypothesis 2: The grinding speed of the tungsten carbide bur (low-speed or high-speed) will not affect enamel loss. Through this research, the authors hope to provide scientific evidence for selecting appropriate grinding methods in clinical practice to reduce enamel loss and protect dental health.