Abrasive wear of bonding adhesives: Studies during treatment and after bracket removal

Björn O. Brobakken,Björn U. Zachrisson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(81)90311-0

1981-02-01

American Journal of Orthodontics

Abstract:Two clinical experiments were performed to evaluate the rate of abrasive wear of some commonly used bonding materials, all filled diacrylate resins. The first study was done on seven orthodontic patients. When the four maxillary incisors were bonded, excess material was deliberately left around the margin of the bracket bases. Bonding adhesives with submicron-size (0.2 to 0.3 μm) filler particles (adhesive E) and larger (average 10 to 30 μm), coarser fillers (adhesives C and S) were studied. The three adhesives were randomly divided between the patients, so that any two of them were used in the same person. At time of bonding and 3 and 6 months later, impressions of the incisors were taken and positive replicas were made. Stereomicroscopy and scanning electron microscopy were used to evaluate any reduction and/or differences in appearance of excess adhesive. The second experiment took place after debonding in ten other persons. At the time of bracket removal, residual adhesive was purposely left on those teeth expected to be most exposed to tooth-brushing forces, namely, the maxillary left canines and neighboring teeth. Studies on abrasive wear in this part were restricted to the adhesive with submicron-size filler particles. A quick-etch technique (10 seconds) proved efficient in revealing the remnants and their wear pattern. The teeth were examined for presence and appearance of residual adhesive at 1- to 2-month intervals for a period of up to 1 year. Standardized intraoral photographs were taken at each visit. Both experiments demonstrated uniform and somewhat surprising results in that the abrasion of all three bonding materials apparently was minimal. Around brackets (Experiment I), excess of the adhesive with submicron filler particles demonstrated slightly more smoothening of surface irregularities than that of the two adhesives with larger filler particles. The latter remained practically unchanged throughout the periods observed. After debonding (Experiment II), the residual adhesive with submicron filler particles showed clinically almost insignificant abrasion. Only the very thin films of adhesive were reduced in size or eliminated, while the thicker layers showed almost no wear over the 1-year observation period (Figs. 6 to 8). As discussed, the clinical consequence of minimal abrasive wear should be that great emphasis must be paid to the use of (1) a bonding technique focused on active removal of excess adhesive around the bracket bases and (2) a debonding technique in which the enamel is left virtually free of adhesive remnants.