Abstract:Background context: Knowledge of sagittal radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients has not yet caught up with our understanding of their roles in patients with adult spinal deformity. It is likely that more emphasis will be placed in restoring sagittal parameters for AIS patients in the future. Therefore, we need to understand how these parameters may vary in AIS to facilitate management plans. Purpose: This study aimed to determine the reproducibility of sagittal spinal parameters on lateral film radiographs in patients with AIS. Study design/setting: This was a retrospective, comparative study conducted in a tertiary health-care institution from January 2013 to February 2016 (3-year period). Patient sample: All AIS patients who underwent deformity correction surgery from January 2013 to February 2016 and had two preoperative serial lateral radiographs taken within the time period of a month were included in the study. Outcome measures: Radiographic sagittal spinal parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar alignment (TL), lumbar lordosis (LL); standard spinopelvic measurements such as pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS); as well as end and apical vertebrae of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar curves were the outcome measures. Methods: All patient data were pooled from electronic medical records, and X-ray images were retrieved from Centricity Enterprise Web. Averaged X-ray measurements by two independent assessors were analyzed by comparing two radiographs of the same patients performed within a 1-month time period. Chi-squared and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for categorical and continuous variables. Results: The study cohort comprised 138 patients, 28 men and 110 women, with a mean age of 15 years (range 11-20). Between the two lateral X-rays, there was a mean difference of 0.79 cm in SVA (p<.001), 0.70° in LL (p=.033), and 0.73° in PT (p=.010). In the combined Lenke 1 and 2 subgroup, there was a similar 0.77 cm (p=.002), 0.79° (p=.009), and 1.49° (p=.001) mean difference in SVA, LL, and PT, respectively. Additionally, there was also a 1.85° (p=.009) and 1.76° (p=.006) mean difference seen in TL and SS, respectively. The overall profile of the sagittal curves remained largely similar, with only the lumbar apex shifting from L3 to L4 during the first and the second X-rays, respectively (p<.001). This occurred for the combined Lenke 1 and 2 subgroup as well (p<.001). Conclusion: Most radiographic sagittal spinal parameters in AIS patients are generally reproducible with some variations up to a maximum of 4°. This natural variation should be taken into account when interpreting these radiographic sagittal parameters so as to achieve the most accurate results in surgical planning.

Inter-Evaluator Reliability of Sagittal and Rotational Spinal Measurements from 3D Ultrasound Imaging of Healthy Females in Standing with Varying Arm Positions

Reliability and accuracy of scoliotic parameters on using a wireless handheld 3D ultrasound for children with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a pilot study

Validation of Scolioscan Air-Portable Radiation-Free Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging Assessment System for Scoliosis

Comparison of Sagittal Spinal Alignment on Standing Plain X-Rays and Supine MRI in Degenerative Lumbar Disease.

Reliability of Robotic Ultrasound Scanning for Scoliosis Assessment in Comparison with Manual Scanning

Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability Assessment of the Axial Trunk Rotation: Manual Versus Smartphone-Aided Measurement Tools

Intra-Examiner Reliability and Validity of Sagittal Cervical Spine Mensuration Methods Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

MRI May Serve As a Valid Alternative to Standing Radiography in Evaluating the Sagittal Alignment of the Upper Thoracic Spine

A Comparative Study on the Consistency of Ultrasound and X‐Ray in Assessing Risser Sign

Validation, repeatability and reproducibility of a noninvasive instrument for measuring thoracic and lumbar curvature of the spine in the sagittal plane

Reproducibility of sagittal radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-a guide to reference values using serial imaging

Measurement of Thoracic Inlet Alignment on MRI: Reliability and the Influence of Body Position.

Assessment of reliability and validity of a handheld surface spine scanner for measuring trunk rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

How Reliable Is the Measurement of the Lateral Center Edge Angle on Scoliosis Radiographs for Detecting Acetabular Dysplasia?

Accuracy and Reliability of X-ray Measurements in the Cervical Spine

Are the Measurements of Cervical Alignment Interchangeable?

Impact of Obesity, Osteopenia, and Scoliosis on Interobserver Reliability of Measures of the Spinopelvic Sagittal Radiographic Parameters

Fully Automated Measurement of Cobb Angles in Coronal Plane Spine Radiographs

Comparison of 3D and 2D Characterization of Spinal Geometry from Biplanar X-rays: a Large Cohort Study.

Reliability of Vertebral Pelvic Angles in Assessment of Spinal Alignment

Is Radiation-Free Ultrasound Accurate for Quantitative Assessment of Spinal Deformity in Idiopathic Scoliosis (IS): A Detailed Analysis with EOS Radiography on 952 Patients.