Abstract:The ability to engage in goal-directed behavior despite exposure to stress is critical to resilience. Questions of how stress can impair or improve behavioral functioning are important in diverse settings, from athletic competitions to academic testing. Previous research suggests that controllability is a key factor in the impact of stress on behavior: learning how to control stressors buffers people from the negative effects of stress on subsequent cognitively demanding tasks. In addition, research suggests that the impact of stress on cognitive functioning depends on an individual's response to stressors: moderate responses to stress can lead to improved performance while extreme (high or low) responses can lead to impaired performance. The present studies tested the hypothesis that (1) learning to behaviorally control stressors leads to improved performance on a test of general executive functioning, the color-word Stroop, and that (2) this improvement emerges specifically for people who report moderate (subjective) responses to stress. Experiment 1: Stroop performance, measured before and after a stress manipulation, was compared across groups of undergraduate participants (n = 109). People who learned to control a noise stressor and received accurate performance feedback demonstrated reduced Stroop interference compared with people exposed to uncontrollable noise stress and feedback indicating an exaggerated rate of failure. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest reduction in Stroop interference. In contrast, in the group exposed to uncontrollable events, self-reported stress failed to predict performance. Experiment 2: In a second sample (n = 90), we specifically investigated the role of controllability by keeping the rate of failure feedback constant across groups. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest Stroop improvement. Once again, this pattern was not demonstrated in the group exposed to uncontrollable events. These results suggest that stress controllability and subjective response interact to affect high-level cognitive abilities. Specifically, exposure to moderate, controllable stress benefits performance, but exposure to uncontrollable stress or having a more extreme response to stress tends to harm performance. These findings may provide insights on how to leverage the beneficial effects of stress in a range of settings.

Choking under pressure: positive cues can mitigate choking in behavior inhibition and switching

Performance pressure decreases behavior inhibition and switching, but not behavior execution: The moderating role of attentional control

An Experimental Study on the "Choking'" Psychological Mechanism of Adolescent Basketball Players

Control strategy under pressure situations: performance pressure conditionally enhances proactive control

Reward Enhances Backward Inhibition in Task Switching

Losing Control in Front of a Fearful Face: the Effect of Emotional Information on Cognitive Control

Open-loop, closed-loop and compensatory control: performance improvement under pressure in a rhythmic task

Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

Very Highly Skilled Individuals Do Not Choke Under Pressure: Evidence from Professional Darts

Does learning a skill with the expectation of teaching it impair the skill's execution under psychological pressure if the skill is learned with analogy instructions?

Immediate and sustained effects of left‐hand dynamic handgrip on choking in men's basketball free‐throw performance

The Effect of Response Inhibition Training on Risky Decision-Making Task Performance

Conquering pressure! The effects of mild-anxiety training on motor performance under pressure during early motor learning.

Unconscious impulsivity control maintains the ability of behavioral inhibitory control in males: Evidence of reaction-time cost

When Does Stress Help or Harm? The Effects of Stress Controllability and Subjective Stress Response on Stroop Performance

Under pressure: the interaction between high-stakes contexts and individual differences in decision-making in humans and non-human species

Association of mindfulness on state-trait anxiety in choking-susceptible athletes: mediating roles of resilience and perceived stress

Some pressures are more equal than others: Effects of isolated pressure on performance

Externally orienting cues improve cognitive control in OCD

The effect of performance pressure and error-feedback on anxiety and performance in an interceptive task

A Closer Look at Warning Cues on the Sustained Attention to Response Task Performance