Abstract:Using the perceptual-motor skill of rhythmically bouncing a ball as an experimental vehicle the present dissertation examined questions about control strategies and their acquisition, adaptation and transfer. Previous studies had already documented that the actor is sensitive to the stability properties of the task dynamics and performs the rhythmic actions with a strategy where effects of perturbations converge back to steady state without requiring error-correcting racket movements. This behavior is consistent with the predictions from stability analyses of a dynamic model of the task. Experiment 1 continued to scrutinize this prediction by applying a range of perturbation magnitudes, designed to be within and outside of the modeli¯s basin of attraction. Results showed that even small perturbations that were predicted to equilibrate passively were blended with active control flexibly responding to perceived errors. However, the time course of return to steady state performance was qualitatively consistent with predictions from passive stability. Experiment 2 investigated how the actor combined passive stability with active control when the dynamic stability of the task was manipulated by varying the coefficient of restitution at the racket-ball contacts. To quantify the degree of control the covariance structure of the state variables was compared with model predictions. These predictions were obtained from a model that was extended by stochastic components to yield predictions about the structure of fluctuations at steady state. Results revealed that, paradoxically, variability of performance decreased with decreasing stability, contrary to common expectations in motor control. This was explained by increasing compensatory variability in execution, a signature of control. Hence, actors rely on passive stability when the stability of the system is high and employ more active control when stability is reduced. Applying the same variability and stability analysis Experiments 3 and 4 revisited issues of acquisition, adaptation and transfer in the same skill. Both experiments clearly demonstrate that the performance improvement is correlated with increased sensitivity to passive stability. Variability was evaluated in a space spanned by execution and result variables by applying the TNC-decomposition of variability (Tolerance, Covariation, Noise). Results highlighted how learning and adaptation is a migration through the execution space combined with the fine-tuning of covariation between relevant variables and a reduction of noise. Sensitivity to passive stability forms some abstract knowledge that is easily transferable across effectors. Compared to the mere examination of outcome measures, the decomposition method provided finer-grained insights about learning, adaptation, and transfer. Taken together, the four studies extend our understanding about how coordinated performance is achieved by exploiting task stability and active control accompanied by changes in the structure of variability.

Open-loop, closed-loop and compensatory control: performance improvement under pressure in a rhythmic task

Control strategy under pressure situations: performance pressure conditionally enhances proactive control

Performance pressure decreases behavior inhibition and switching, but not behavior execution: The moderating role of attentional control

An Experimental Study on the "Choking'" Psychological Mechanism of Adolescent Basketball Players

Perceptual Scale Expansion: A Natural Design for Improving the Precision of Motor Control.

STABILITY AND VARIABLITY IN A RHYTHMIC TASK: BEHAVIORAL DATA AND DYNAMIC MODELS

An Experimental Study on the Performance of Motor Skills Acquired Implicitly under Pressure

When Does Stress Help or Harm? The Effects of Stress Controllability and Subjective Stress Response on Stroop Performance

Passive Stability and Active Control in a Rhythmic Task.

Some pressures are more equal than others: Effects of isolated pressure on performance

Chronic academic stress facilitates response inhibition: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence

Choking under Pressure:Paradoxical Efforts and Suscep Tibility in Sports

Optimal Control of a Hybrid Rhythmic-Discrete Task: the Bouncing Ball Revisited

Conquering pressure! The effects of mild-anxiety training on motor performance under pressure during early motor learning.

Acute psychosocial stress modulates neural and behavioral substrates of cognitive control

Effects of competitive pressure on expert performance: Underlying psychological, physiological, and kinematic mechanisms

Examining Modifications of Execution Strategies During a Continuous Task.

An Integrative Framework of Stress, Attention, and Visuomotor Performance

Actively Tracking "Passive" Stability In A Ball Bouncing Task

Expert and Novice Performers Respond Differently to Attentional Focus Cues for Speed Jump Roping

How do pressure impact attention control in precision sports: attentional engagement or attentional disengagement?