Abstract:The increasing popularity of spatial transcriptomics has allowed researchers to analyze transcriptome data in its tissue sample’s spatial context. Various methods have been developed for detecting SV (spatially variable) genes, with distinct spatial expression patterns. However, the accuracy of using these SV genes in clustering has not been thoroughly studied. On the other hand, in single cell resolution sequencing data without spatial context, clustering analysis is usually done on highly variable (HV) genes. Here we investigate if integrating SV genes and HV genes from spatial transcriptomics data can improve clustering performance beyond using SV genes alone. We examined three methods that detect SV genes, including Giotto, spatialDE, and SPARK, and evaluated six methods that integrate different features measured from the same samples including MOFA+, scVI, Seurat v4, CIMLR, SNF, and the straightforward concatenation approach. We applied these methods on 19 real datasets from three different spatial transcriptomics technologies (merFISH, SeqFISH+, and Visium) as well as 20 simulated datasets of varying spatial expression conditions. Our evaluations show that MOFA+ and simple concatenation have good performances in general, despite the variations among datasets and spatial transcriptomics platforms. This work shows that integrating highly variable and spatially variable genes in the spatial transcriptomics data can improve clustering beyond using spatially variable genes only. It also provides practical guides on the choices of computational methods to accomplish this goal.### Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.

Evaluating spatially variable gene detection methods for spatial transcriptomics data

A selective review of recent developments in spatially variable gene detection for spatial transcriptomics

Categorization of 33 computational methods to detect spatially variable genes from spatially resolved transcriptomics data

Disparities in spatially variable gene calling highlight the need for benchmarking spatial transcriptomics methods

Spanve: an Statistical Method to Detect Clustering-friendly Spatially Variable Genes in Large-scale Spatial Transcriptomics Data

Benchmarking algorithms for spatially variable gene identification in spatial transcriptomics

Benchmarking Computational Integration Methods for Spatial Transcriptomics Data

PROST: quantitative identification of spatially variable genes and domain detection in spatial transcriptomics

A Bayesian modified Ising model for identifying spatially variable genes from spatial transcriptomics data

Spanve: A Statistical Method for Detecting Downstream-Friendly Spatially Variable Genes in Large-Scale Spatial Transcriptomic Data

spVC for the detection and interpretation of spatial gene expression variation

DESpace : spatially variable gene detection via differential expression testing of spatial clusters

SPACE: Spatially variable gene clustering adjusting for cell type effect for improved spatial domain detection

Adding Highly Variable Genes to Spatially Variable Genes Can Improve Cell Type Clustering Performance in Spatial Transcriptomics Data

Comparative Analysis of Packages and Algorithms for the Analysis of Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Data

Computational Approaches and Challenges in Spatial Transcriptomics

Advances in spatial transcriptomic data analysis

Statistical and machine learning methods for spatially resolved transcriptomics data analysis

Systematic comparison of sequencing-based spatial transcriptomic methods

Spatial pattern and differential expression analysis with spatial transcriptomic data