Abstract:MOTIVATION:Recent advancements in high-throughput imaging have created new large datasets with tens of thousands of gene expression images. Methods for capturing these spatial and/or temporal expression patterns include in situ hybridization or fluorescent reporter constructs or tags, and results are still frequently assessed by subjective qualitative comparisons. In order to deal with available large datasets, fully automated analysis methods must be developed to properly normalize and model spatial expression patterns.RESULTS:We have developed image segmentation and registration methods to identify and extract spatial gene expression patterns from RNA in situ hybridization experiments of Drosophila embryos. These methods allow us to normalize and extract expression information for 78,621 images from 3724 genes across six time stages. The similarity between gene expression patterns is computed using four scoring metrics: mean squared error, Haar wavelet distance, mutual information and spatial mutual information (SMI). We additionally propose a strategy to calculate the significance of the similarity between two expression images, by generating surrogate datasets with similar spatial expression patterns using a Monte Carlo swap sampler. On data from an early development time stage, we show that SMI provides the most biologically relevant metric of comparison, and that our significance testing generalizes metrics to achieve similar performance. We exemplify the application of spatial metrics on the well-known Drosophila segmentation network.AVAILABILITY:A Java webstart application to register and compare patterns, as well as all source code, are available from: http://tools.genome.duke.edu/generegulation/image_analysis/insituCONTACT:uwe.ohler@duke.eduSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

DESpace : spatially variable gene detection via differential expression testing of spatial clusters

SPACE: Spatially variable gene clustering adjusting for cell type effect for improved spatial domain detection

Spanve: an Statistical Method to Detect Clustering-friendly Spatially Variable Genes in Large-scale Spatial Transcriptomics Data

Spatial pattern and differential expression analysis with spatial transcriptomic data

Disparities in spatially variable gene calling highlight the need for benchmarking spatial transcriptomics methods

SpatialDE2: Fast and localized variance component analysis of spatial transcriptomics

PROST: quantitative identification of spatially variable genes and domain detection in spatial transcriptomics

Evaluating spatially variable gene detection methods for spatial transcriptomics data

SpaceExpress: a method for comparative spatial transcriptomics based on intrinsic coordinate systems of tissues

Extraction and Comparison of Gene Expression Patterns from 2d Rna in Situ Hybridization Images

STANCE: a unified statistical model to detect cell-type-specific spatially variable genes in spatial transcriptomics

Cell type-specific inference of differential expression in spatial transcriptomics

Addressing the mean-variance relationship in spatially resolved transcriptomics data with spoon

Inferring histology-associated gene expression gradients in spatial transcriptomic studies

Comparative Analysis of Packages and Algorithms for the Analysis of Spatially Resolved Transcriptomics Data

Benchmarking Computational Integration Methods for Spatial Transcriptomics Data

SOMDE: a scalable method for identifying spatially variable genes with self-organizing map

spVC for the detection and interpretation of spatial gene expression variation

scBSP: A fast and accurate tool for identifying spatially variable genes from spatial transcriptomic data

SINFONIA: Scalable Identification of Spatially Variable Genes for Deciphering Spatial Domains