Abstract:Purpose The misalignment correction in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), which is usually carried out in an offline manner, is a difficult and tedious process. It becomes even more challenging in microscopic CBCT due to the much higher requirements on spatial resolution. In practice, however, an offline approach for misalignment correction may not be readily implementable, especially in the situations where either time is of the essence or the process needs to be carried out repetitively. Thus, an online self-calibration (i.e., data sustained misalignment correction without the involvement of specific alignment phantom) would be more practical. In this work, we investigate the data sustained misalignment correction in microscopic CBCT via optimization under the Grangeat Epipolar Consistence Condition and evaluate its performance via phantom and specimen studies. Methods With the cost function defined according to the Grangeat Epipolar Consistency Condition (G-ECC) and by minimizing the cost function using the simplex-simulated annealing algorithm (SIMPSA), we evaluate and verify the G-ECC optimization-based online self-calibration method's performance. Performance is measured in sensitivity, robustness, and accuracy using the projection data of phantoms generated by computer simulation and botanical specimens acquired by a prototype microscopic CBCT. Results The online data sustained misalignment correction in microscopic CBCT via G-ECC optimization works very well in sensitivity and robustness, in addition to its accuracy of 0.27%, 0.48%, and 0.34% relative errors, respectively, in obtaining the three geometric parameters that are the most critical to image reconstruction in CBCT. Quantitatively, the performance in meeting the requirements on spatial resolution is comparable to, if not better than, that of the offline misalignment correction method, in which a specific alignment phantom has to be used. Conclusions The G-ECC optimization-based online self-calibration approach provides a practical solution (as long as no latitudinal (lateral) data truncation occurs) for misalignment correction in microscopic CBCT, an application that demands high accuracy in geometric alignment for biological (cellular) imaging at super high spatial resolutions in the order of micrometers (2.1 mu m).

Geometric correction of cone beam computed laminography based on projected address translation

Unified Optical Distortion Correction Method for Imaging Systems Using A Concise Geometrical Transformation Model

Misaligned Cone Beam Computed Tomography Reconstruction Based on a Camera Model

An anisotropic alternating regularization-based reconstruction algorithm for cone beam computed laminography

Beam hardening correction method for Cone-Beam computed tomography based on reprojection of slice contours

Analytical Geometric Parameter Calibration Algorithm for Cone-Beam CT

Cone-beam computed laminography with anisotropic adaptive weighted total variation minimization based on the framework of the Chambolle-Pock algorithm

Projection angle based geometric correction for micro cone-beam CT

A calibration method for misaligned scanner geometry in cone-beam computed tomography

An Error-Reduction-Based Algorithm For Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

A simple and precise alignment calibration method for cone-beam computed tomography with the verifications

Geometric Artifacts Correction of Equiangular Fan-Beam Industrial CT System

Geometric Calibration Of Cone-Beam Ct With A Flat-Panel Detector

Data Sustained Misalignment Correction in Microscopic Cone Beam CT Via Optimization under the Grangeat Epipolar Consistency Condition

A New Method for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Geometric Parameters Estimation.

A Projection Matrix-Based Geometric Calibration Algorithm In Cbct System

Automatic and Computationally Efficient Alignment in Fan- and Cone-beam Tomography

The Dynamic Correction of Collimation Errors of CT Slicing Pictures

Adaptive Beam Hardening Correction Based On Projection Data Consistency Condition

Reduction of Artifacts Induced by Misaligned Geometry in Cone-Beam CT.