Cascading risks, interdependent rights, and the progression of vulnerability in the context of pandemic containment measures: Implications for anticipatory action and the humanitarian-development nexus

Matthew Scott
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104360
IF: 4.842
2024-03-06
International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Abstract:This paper articulates a human rights-based approach to addressing cascading risks in the context of pandemic containment measures. It sets out to highlight how the principle that human rights are interdependent and interrelated, reflected in normative standards articulated by human rights treaty body mechanisms, can inform anticipatory action and work at the humanitarian-development nexus. Grounding a human rightsbased approach in the political-ecological understanding of the progression of vulnerability, it considers how lockdown interfered with the right to freedom of movement and the right to work, which in turn had cascading effects on the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health, the right to adequate housing and the right to water and sanitation, amongst others. Informed by Scott et al.'s (2023) Framework for Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality (FIRE), the paper outlines specific entry points for integrating this approach at points along the humanitarian-development nexus continuum, grounded in an appreciation of root causes, dynamic pressures and unsafe conditions characteristic of the progression of vulnerability. The article calls for pilot studies to explore the impact of an integrated human rights-based approach to cascading pandemic risk
geosciences, multidisciplinary,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,water resources
What problem does this paper attempt to address?