Abstract:Abstract. This paper combines research and commentary to reinforce the importance of integrating hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) into multi-hazard methodologies. We present a synthesis of the differences between multi-layer single-hazard approaches and multi-hazard approaches that integrate such interactions. This synthesis suggests that ignoring interactions between important environmental and anthropogenic processes could distort management priorities, increase vulnerability to other spatially relevant hazards or underestimate disaster risk. In this paper we proceed to present an enhanced multi-hazard framework through the following steps: (i) description and definition of three groups (natural hazards, anthropogenic processes and technological hazards/disasters) as relevant components of a multi-hazard environment, (ii) outlining of three types of interaction relationship (triggering, increased probability, and catalysis/impedance), and (iii) assessment of the importance of networks of interactions (cascades) through case study examples (based on the literature, field observations and semi-structured interviews). We further propose two visualisation frameworks to represent these networks of interactions: hazard interaction matrices and hazard/process flow diagrams. Our approach reinforces the importance of integrating interactions between different aspects of the Earth system, together with human activity, into enhanced multi-hazard methodologies. Multi-hazard approaches support the holistic assessment of hazard potential and consequently disaster risk. We conclude by describing three ways by which understanding networks of interactions contributes to the theoretical and practical understanding of hazards, disaster risk reduction and Earth system management. Understanding interactions and interaction networks helps us to better (i) model the observed reality of disaster events, (ii) constrain potential changes in physical and social vulnerability between successive hazards, and (iii) prioritise resource allocation for mitigation and disaster risk reduction.

Increased human risk caused by cascading hazards – A framework

Dynamic risk framework for cascading compounding climate-geological hazards: A perspective on coastal communities in subduction zones

Quantification of Human Vulnerability to Earthquake-Induced Landslides Using Bayesian Network

Multirisk Landslide Scenarios in Geotechnical Sustainability: A Case Study

ASSESSMENT OF HUMAN RISKS POSED BY DEADLY DEBRIS FLOW IN THE WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE AREA

Addressing cascading effects of earthquakes in urban areas from network perspective to improve disaster mitigation

Cascading disasters risk modeling based on linear uncertainty distributions

Probabilistic Framework for Quantifying Human Flight Failure Rate to Landslides

Progress in Multi-hazard Comprehensive Risk Assessment

Risk Assessment of Population Loss Posed by Earthquake-Landslide-Debris Flow Disaster Chain: A Case Study in Wenchuan, China

Mortality risk assessment for earthquake-landslide-debris flow disaster chain under different scenarios: A case study in Wenchuan, China

Global multi-hazard risk assessment in a changing climate

A Risk Assessment Method for Multi‐Hazard Coupling Disasters

Scenario-Driven Methodology for Cascading Disasters Risk Assessment of Earthquake on Chemical Industrial Park

Scenario-based Risk Framework Selection and Assessment Model Development for Natural Disasters: a Case Study of Typhoon Storm Surges

Analysis of Human Risks Due to Dam Break Floods—part 2: Application to Tangjiashan Landslide Dam Failure

Cascading Hazard Analysis of a Hospital Building

Research on Multi-Hazard Risk Management Framework for Coastal City

Increasing risk of cascading hazards in the central Himalayas

Hazard interactions and interaction networks (cascades) within multi-hazard methodologies