Time to move on from 'time-to-first': should all events be included in the analysis of clinical trials?

S. Anker,J. McMurray
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs277
IF: 39.3
2012-11-01
European Heart Journal
Abstract:This editorial refers to ‘Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: the SHIFT Study’ by J.S. Borer et al., doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs259 Not that long ago a diagnosis of heart failure was a death sentence. For example, a patient hospitalized with heart failure in the late 1980s had a median survival of <1.25 years after discharge. Those with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF) died either from progressive pump failure or suddenly, mainly due to ventricular arrhythmias. This picture has been transformed in the past two decades. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and devices (implanted cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy) have completely changed the prognosis for patients with HF-REF. Systolic heart failure has been converted from a relatively short-term and quickly fatal condition to a chronic disease characterized by recurrent non-fatal events (hospital admissions) and delayed death that is now nearly as often due to a non-cardiovascular as a cardiovascular cause. Our design of clinical trials and choice of endpoints has to reflect this changing pattern of disease. All-cause mortality is no longer considered an appropriate or practical endpoint for clinical trials in heart failure. First, the mortality rate in heart failure has decreased so dramatically that trials using death from any cause as the primary outcome have become unfeasibly large. Secondly,as outlined above, non-cardiovascular deaths now account for a substantial proportion of deaths in heart failure. As they are unlikely to be reduced by a therapy for heart failure, their inclusion in a primary endpoint obscures the effect of treatment on the disease in question by adding ‘noise’. Thirdly, and most …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?