Abstract:Objective: Chronic venous disease is a common condition and has a significant impact on patients' health status. Validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess health status are needed to measure health status. This state-of-the-art review summarizes the current validation evidence for disease-specific PROMs for chronic venous disease and provides a framework for their use in the clinical setting. Methods: A literature search in OVID Embase and Medline was conducted to identify relevant English-language studies of chronic venous disease that used disease-specific PROMs between January 1, 1993, and June 30, 2022. Abstracts and titles from identified studies were screened by four investigators, and full-text articles were subsequently screened for eligibility. Data on validation of disease-specific PROMs was abstracted from each included article. Classical test theory was used as a framework to examine a priori defined validation criteria for content validity, reliability (construct validity, internal reliability, and test-retest reliability), responsiveness, and expansion of the validation evidence base (use in randomized controlled trials and comparative effectiveness research, cultural or linguistic translations, predictive validity, or establishing the minimal clinically important difference threshold, defined as smallest amount an outcome or measure is perceived as a meaningful change to patients). The PROMs were categorized into three groups based on the manifestations of disease of the population for which they were developed. The overall validity of each PROM was assessed across three stages of validation including content validity (phase 1); construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness (phase 2); and expansion of the validation evidence base (phase 3). Results: Of 2338 unique studies screened, 112 studies (4.8%) met inclusion criteria. The eight disease-specific PROMs identified were categorized into three groups: (1) overall chronic venous disease (C1 to C6); (2) C1 to C4 disease; and (3) C5 to C6 disease. Assessed by group, the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire met criteria for validation at all three phases for patients with C1 to C4 disease, and the Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire met criteria for validation at all three phases for patients with C5 to C6 disease. There were no PROMs that met all criteria for validation for use in overall chronic venous disease (C1 to C6). Conclusions: Of the eight PROMs assessed in this review, only two met prespecified criteria at each phase for validation. The Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire and Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire should be considered for use in patients with chronic venous disease without venous ulcers and with venous ulcers, respectively.

Patient reported outcome and experience measures among patients with central venous access devices: a systematic review

Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures in Advanced Nursing Practice: What Are Key Considerations for Implementation and Optimized Use?

Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review

Assessing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy with patient reported outcome measures: a systematic review of measurement properties and considerations for future use

Health-related quality of life and experience measures, to assess patients’ experiences of peripheral intravenous catheters: a secondary data analysis

A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer Care: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Advancing patient-centered cancer care: a systematic review of electronic patient-reported outcome measures

A state-of-the-art review of quality-of-life assessment in venous disease

Outcome Measurement Instruments Used to Evaluate Dermatologic Adverse Events in Cancer Trials

Central venous access device adverse events in pediatric patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The use of patient-reported outcome measures to improve patient-related outcomes – a systematic review

Vascular access device type for systemic anti-cancer therapies in cancer patients. A scoping review

Routine use of patient-reported experience and outcome measures for children and young people: a scoping review

Implementation frameworks, strategies and outcomes in optimizing central venous access device practice in paediatrics: A scoping review

Vascular Access Outcomes Reported in Maintenance Hemodialysis Trials: A Systematic Review

Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Collection and Utilization: A Survey of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Members

Patient‐reported outcome measure use among older adults after emergency department care: A systematic review

Development and validation of a patient reported experience measure for experimental cancer medicines (PREM-ECM) and their carers (PREM-ECM-Carer)

Patient-Reported Experience Measures to Evaluate and Improve the Quality of Care in Nephrology

Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures in pleural interventions