Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Collection and Utilization: A Survey of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Members

Lauren M. Shapiro,Kurt Spindler,Brian Cunningham,Jason Koh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-23-00879
IF: 4
2024-01-20
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Abstract:In the 1910s, Ernest Codman, an orthopaedic surgeon, advocated for the concept of 'end result,' or the idea that every surgeon should follow patients long enough to evaluate whether a treatment was successful, and if not, to inquire why. Codman highlighted the importance of measuring outcomes to prevent similar complications and to improve the quality and efficiency of care. As surgeons began following Codman's end result concept, physician-reported measurement (eg, mortality, range of motion) became a standard method by which to evaluate outcomes. Since this time, health care has continued to evolve from one often characterized by paternalism and fee-for-service models to one that favors value-based and patient-centered care. Correspondingly, and recognizing that physician-reported measures may not correlate with the patient perspective, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed and incorporated into clinical research and care. PROMs are questionnaires completed by patients and are designed to capture the patient's report about their health status and symptom burden.
surgery,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?