Abstract:Background: Despite the increasing use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for collecting self-reported data among hospital outpatients, clinicians' use of these data remains suboptimal. Insight into this issue and strategies to enhance the use of PROMs are critical but limited. Objective: This study aimed to examine clinicians' use of PROM data for value-based outpatient consultations and identify efforts to enhance their use of PROMs in a Dutch university hospital. First, we aimed to investigate clinicians' use of outpatients' PROM data in 2023, focusing on adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Second, we aimed to develop insights into the organizational-level strategies implemented to enhance clinicians' use of PROM data from 2020 to 2023. This included understanding the underlying rationales for these strategies and identifying strategies that appeared to be missing to address barriers or leverage facilitators. Third, we aimed to explore the key factors driving and constraining clinicians' use of PROMs in 2023. Methods: We integrated data from 4 sources: 1-year performance data on clinicians' use of PROMs (n=70 subdepartments), internal hospital documents from a central support team (n=56), a survey among clinicians (n=47), and interviews with individuals contributing to the organizational-level implementation of PROMs (n=20). The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework was used to analyze clinicians' adoption, implementation, and maintenance of PROMs. Strategies were analyzed using the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change taxonomy, and results were structured around the constructs of capability, opportunity, and motivation. Results: On average, around 2023, clinicians accessed PROM data for approximately 3 of 20 (14%) patients during their outpatient consultation, despite numerous strategies to improve this practice. We identified issues in adoption, implementation, and maintenance. The hospital's strategies, shaped organically and pragmatically, were related to 27 (37%) out of 73 Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change strategies. These strategies focused on enhancing clinicians' capability, opportunity, and motivation. We found shortcomings in the quality of execution and completeness of strategies in relation to addressing all barriers and leveraging facilitators. We identified variations in the factors influencing the use of PROMs among frequent PROM users, occasional users, and nonusers. Challenges to effective facilitation were apparent, with certain desired strategies being unfeasible or impeded. Conclusions: Enhancing clinicians' use of PROMs has remained challenging despite various strategies aimed at improving their capability, opportunity, and motivation. The use of PROMs may require more substantial changes than initially expected, necessitating a shift in clinicians' professional attitudes and practices. Hospitals can facilitate rather than manage clinicians' genuine use of PROMs. They must prioritize efforts to engage clinicians with PROMs for value-based outpatient care. Specific attention to their professionalization may be warranted. Tailored strategies, designed to address within-group differences in clinicians' needs and motivation, hold promise for future efforts.

The use of patient-reported outcome measures to improve patient-related outcomes – a systematic review

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as proof of treatment efficacy

A landscape assessment of the use of patient reported outcome measures in research, quality improvement and clinical care across a healthcare organisation

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer Care: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Understanding factors impacting patient-reported outcome measures integration in routine clinical practice: an umbrella review

Routine use of patient-reported experience and outcome measures for children and young people: a scoping review

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Clinical Practice: Practical Guidance for Institutional Review Boards

Facilitators and barriers to implementing electronic patient-reported outcome and experience measures in a health care setting: a systematic review

Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis

Barriers and enablers to the implementation of patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs): protocol for an umbrella review

Enhancing Clinicians' Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Outpatient Care: Mixed Methods Study

Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Collection and Utilization: A Survey of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Members

Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review

Equitable Integration of Patient-Reported Outcomes Into Clinical Practice—Opportunities, Challenges, and a Roadmap for Implementation

Facilitators and Barriers in the Implementation and Adoption of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurements in Daily Practice

Research progress in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

Selecting patient-reported outcome measures: "what" and "for whom"

Educating patients about patient-reported outcomes-are we there yet?

Patient-reported outcome measures for paediatric gender-affirming care: A systematic review

[The use of PROMs (patient-reported outcome measures) and PREMs (patient-reported experience measures) in Cardiology: current state and applications to improve patient care]

Patient‐reported outcome measure use among older adults after emergency department care: A systematic review