Abstract:Purpose This study aims to explore the strategies corporations use in engaging stakeholders to sustain healthy corporate partnerships and create value for the corporate entity and the society in which they operate and their influence on the corporate manager's cognitive abilities and decision-making. Design/methodology/approach The authors used an interpretive research approach leveraging the strengths of qualitative method of content analysis and comparative and critical analyses to report the results. Interpretive methods incorporate social theories and standpoints that view reality as the social construction of understandable events in the context of organizational communication. Findings The findings of this study suggest that corporations are assumed to follow and execute the principles of engaging stakeholders to achieve corporate social responsibility (CSR) claiming to manage a sustainable and responsible business practices that recognize local cultures, human rights and protect the environment. However, little attention has been paid to the cognitive reasoning of the individuals responsible for CSR and corporate sustainability (CS) as opposed to the growing concerns about strategies corporations use in engaging stakeholders to sustain healthy corporate partnerships and create value – especially the processes that take place during engagement and decision-making including cognitive offloading. Practical implications Stakeholder engagement requires practical approaches that enable corporations and individuals charged with decision-making responsibilities to understand, respond and fulfill their CSRs. To achieve CSRs, corporations and managers responsible for relevant decision-making would need to involve stakeholders in social performance planning, as social reporting/auditing has long been advocating for preventing managerial biasness, groupthink and increased information dissemination via detailed reporting practices toward more collaborative stakeholder relationships. Thus, it is crucial for corporations to implement enhanced stakeholder and managerial decision-making strategies such as integrative approaches to achieve balance in the trio elements of sustainability as well as the growing use of paradox perspective to understand the nature of the tensions being sought to balance and, in the process, provide opportunity for a better evaluation of complex sustainability issues for innovative approach to resolving them. While cognitive decision-making is at play, in practice, managers tasked with making decisions must ensure the most effective stakeholder engagement strategies that are transparent and inclusive are used. Originality/value The main contribution of this study is its argument regarding the tools corporations use in engaging key stakeholders and the cognitive reasoning of the individuals responsible for CSR and CS. The study further contributes to interpreting the integrative approach to achieving balance in the trio elements of sustainability as well as the growing use of paradox perspective to understand the nature of the tensions being sought to balance and, in the process, provide an opportunity for a better evaluation of complex sustainability issues for an innovative approach to resolving them.

Stakeholder engagement as a sustainable development strategy: Managerial entrenchment for cross‐shareholdings

Managerial entrenchment and corporate social responsibility engagement: the role of economic policy uncertainty

The influence of stakeholder on a company's sustainable practice: Insights from the Japanese perspective

Stakeholder-Centered Corporate Governance and Corporate Sustainable Development: Evidence from CSR Practices in the Top Companies by Market Capitalization at Shanghai Stock Exchange of China

Is Managerial Entrenchment Always Bad and Corporate Social Responsibility Always Good? A Cross-National Examination of Their Combined Influence on Shareholder Value

Impact of stakeholder engagement strategies on managerial cognitive decision-making: the context of CSP and CSR

How cross‐shareholding influences financial reporting: Evidence from Japan

Do Corporate Social Responsibility Engagements Lead to Real Environmental, Social, and Governance Impact?

Ownership structure, corporate governance, and assurance in sustainability reporting: evidence from Japan

The potential impact of managerial entrenchment on firms’ corporate social responsibility activities and financial performance: evidence from Iran

Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence

Internal Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Chinese Companies

A Stakeholder Resource-Based View of Corporate Social Irresponsibility: Evidence from China

Sustainable Strategies: Navigating Corporate Social Responsibility and Irresponsibility for Enlightened Self-Interest

CSR Initiatives of Controlling Shareholder in Share Pledge Firms: Sustainable Orientation or Interim Plan?

The Evolution of Investor Activism in Japan

Stakeholder engagement and corporate social responsibility reporting: the ownership structure effect

Changing overwork culture: Stakeholder management for employee wellbeing and social sustainability in large Japanese companies

Sustainable development goals and corporate financial performance: Examining the influence of stakeholder engagement

Employee‐oriented corporate social responsibility, innovation, and firm value

Too Much of a Good Thing: the Dual Effect of Executive Equity Incentives on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance