Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Research Question/issue</h3><p>This study investigates the effect of cross‐shareholding on financial reporting and the information environment in the Japanese market and hypothesizes that higher cross‐shareholding is related to lower contract‐efficient earnings recognition and higher information asymmetry because cross‐shareholding entrenches managers. Furthermore, we investigate whether managers try to maximize their self‐interest or to enjoy a quiet life when they are isolated from market pressure and entrenched owing to cross‐shareholding.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Research Findings/Insights</h3><p>Using a unique dataset on cross‐shareholding among Japanese listed firms, we find that higher cross‐shareholding is associated with (1) less timely loss recognition and (2) higher probability of information‐based trading. Further investigation clarifies that higher cross‐shareholdings are related to (3) lower absolute forecast error and (4) lower R&D expenditures. The first two findings indicate that cross‐shareholding entrenches managers, and the last two findings show that entrenched managers enjoy a quiet life.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Theoretical/Academic Implications</h3><p>This study contributes to the corporate governance literature by providing new evidence that cross‐shareholding influences financial reporting and the information environment in the market by inducing managers to become entrenched and to enjoy a quiet life.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Practitioner/Policy Implications</h3><p>This study provides implications for policymakers in markets in which cross‐shareholding is a common ownership format. To enhance contract‐efficient financial reporting and/or reduce information asymmetry in the market, it may be necessary to reduce cross‐shareholding.</p></section>

The Evolution of Investor Activism in Japan

Stakeholder engagement as a sustainable development strategy: Managerial entrenchment for cross‐shareholdings

CEO Activism and Firm Value

The Evolution of Corporate Governance in China : the Role of Institutional Investors

Do investors’ reactions to CSR-related news communication differ by shareholder? An empirical analysis from Japan

Empirical study on voting results and proxy advisor recommendations in Japan

The Downside of Displaying Agentic Values: Evidence from Shareholder Activism

Institutional Investor Activism in a Context of Concentrated Ownership and High Private Benefits of Control: The Case of Italy

Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance

The Role of Passive Investors in Corporate Governance and Socially Responsible Investing: Evidence from Shareholder Proposals

Institutional ownership and corporate risk-taking in Japanese listed firms

Does Employee Stock Ownership Work? Evidence from Publicly-Traded Firms in Japan

Does soft shareholder activism hold hard consequences?

The effects of anti-takeover measures on Japanese corporations

CEO activism. What do we know? What don’t we know? A systematic literature review

Ownership structure, corporate governance, and assurance in sustainability reporting: evidence from Japan

How cross‐shareholding influences financial reporting: Evidence from Japan

Different visions of stewardship: understanding interactions between large investment managers and activist shareholders

Disentangling the effects of hedge fund activism on firm financial and social performance

Corporate governance, institutional investor type and firm performance: Evidence from an emerging market

Sustainable investments in the face of social unrest and risk: A new perspective on corporate social responsibility