Understanding the ocean science debate

Herman T. Franssen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00908327409545546

1974-01-01

Abstract:Several spokesmen for the American ocean science community have come out in favor of providing technical assistance in the marine sciences to developing countries, in return for uncontrolled access for scientific research to coastal waters beyond narrow territorial limits. The writer of this article does not believe that technical assistance can be used as a quid pro quo to obtain unrestricted access to the proposed resource zone for scientific research. In the first place, developing countries, which have expressed a strong desire to control foreign‐conducted research in the proposed resource zone, are not likely to relinquish sovereign rights over parts of their claimed “national territory”; for a vague promise of technical assistance. Secondly, nations move through various stages of scientific and technological development: from complete dependence on foreign science and technology to the development of an independent scientific tradition. There is some historical evidence to suggest that when nations are progressing in the direction of an indigenous scientific capability they tend to restrict the access to their national territory of foreign scientists. Scientific research is considered a national resource, to be conducted by indigenous scientists, and the findings to be published in national journals. Once the transition towards an independent scientific capability has been completed, restrictions on foreign‐conducted science tend to subside. As most developing countries are now somewhere between the stage of complete dependence on foreign science (most of Africa) and the final independent stage (Europe, U.S., U.S.S.R., Japan), restrictions on foreign‐conducted oceanic research are likely to grow within their national territories. Offering technical assistance in the marine sciences is not likely to change the positions of developing coastal states.

international relations,law