Abstract:The Collective Arrangement, subscribed to by OSPAR and NEAFC and presented as a model by these organisations, suggests that regional seas organisations, such as OSPAR , are to act as standard setters for the conservation of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction ( ABNJ ). The model suggests that regional seas organisations and other organisations, such as NEAFC , the IMO and the ISA , then are to regulate human activities for which they are competent within these conservation standards. This article explores whether the Collective Arrangement might indeed function as a model for ocean governance in ABNJ and merits encouragement in a future BBNJ agreement. It concludes that the Collective Arrangement, as a model, raises both opportunities and challenges but that it might not be transplantable to other areas beyond national jurisdiction, given that the elements that characterise cooperation in the North-East Atlantic are not present in most other areas in ABNJ . The Collective Arrangement, subscribed to by OSPAR and NEAFC and presented as a model by these organisations, suggests that regional seas organisations, such as OSPAR , are to act as standard setters for the conservation of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction ( ABNJ ). The model suggests that regional seas organisations and other organisations, such as NEAFC , the IMO and the ISA , then are to regulate human activities for which they are competent within these conservation standards. This article explores whether the Collective Arrangement might indeed function as a model for ocean governance in ABNJ and merits encouragement in a future BBNJ agreement. It concludes that the Collective Arrangement, as a model, raises both opportunities and challenges but that it might not be transplantable to other areas beyond national jurisdiction, given that the elements that characterise cooperation in the North-East Atlantic are not present in most other areas in ABNJ . The Collective Arrangement, subscribed to by OSPAR and NEAFC and presented as a model by these organisations, suggests that regional seas organisations, such as OSPAR , are to act as standard setters for the conservation of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction ( ABNJ ). The model suggests that regional seas organisations and other organisations, such as NEAFC , the IMO and the ISA , then are to regulate human activities for which they are competent within these conservation standards. This article explores whether the Collective Arrangement might indeed function as a model for ocean governance in ABNJ and merits encouragement in a future BBNJ agreement. It concludes that the Collective Arrangement, as a model, raises both opportunities and challenges but that it might not be transplantable to other areas beyond national jurisdiction, given that the elements that characterise cooperation in the North-East Atlantic are not present in most other areas in ABNJ . The Collective Arrangement, subscribed to by OSPAR and NEAFC and presented as a model by these organisations, suggests that regional seas organisations, such as OSPAR , are to act as standard setters for the conservation of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction ( ABNJ ). The model suggests that regional seas organisations and other organisations, such as NEAFC , the IMO and the ISA , then are to regulate human activities for which they are competent within these conservation standards. This article explores whether the Collective Arrangement might indeed function as a model for ocean governance in ABNJ and merits encouragement in a future BBNJ agreement. It concludes that the Collective Arrangement, as a model, raises both opportunities and challenges but that it might not be transplantable to other areas beyond national jurisdiction, given that the elements that characterise cooperation in the North-East Atlantic are not present in most other areas in ABNJ .

The conservation‐extraction nexus in ocean areas beyond National Jurisdiction: Tension or co‐constitution?

Undermining by Mining? Deep Seabed Mining in Light of International Marine Environmental Law

Overlapping and fragmentation in the protection and conservation of the marine environment in areas beyond national jurisdiction

Polycentricity and Regional Ocean Governance: Implications for the Emerging UN Agreement on Marine Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction

Seabed Mining and Approaches to Governance of the Deep Seabed

Towards an Ecosystem Approach to Management in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: REMPs for Deep Seabed Mining and the Proposed BBNJ Instrument

Advancing ocean equity at the nexus of development, climate and conservation policy

Towards Ecosystem-based Management of the Global Ocean: Strengthening Regional Cooperation through a New Agreement for the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction

Blue Economy and Competing Discourses in International Oceans Governance

The contribution of the law of the sea convention to marine environmental protection: 40 years of shimmering seas or high hopes dashed against juridical rocks?

The landlocked ocean: landlocked states in BBNJ negotiations and the impact of fixed land-sea relations in global ocean governance

Systematic Conservation Planning: A Better Recipe for Managing the High Seas for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use

Reimagining the Law of the Sea: Evolution or Revolution?

Appraising the Modus of Conservation and Sustainable Use of Arctic Marine Biodiversity of Areas beyond National Jurisdiction under the Umbrella of the BBNJ Treaty

Navigating the nexus between UNCLOS and the sustainable development goals: Perspectives from transitions in Norway's ocean governance regime

Securing a Just Space for Small-Scale Fisheries in the Blue Economy

Protecting Biodiversity in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: an Earth System Governance Perspective

The OSPAR NEAFC Collective Arrangement and Ocean Governance: Regional Seas Organisations as the Setters of Conservation Standards in ABNJ?

Does the Regime Secure the Common Heritage’s Benefit-sharing and Marine Environmental Protection Components?

DEEP-SEA mining: Policy options to preserve the last frontier - Lessons from Antarctica’s mineral resource convention

Beyond “not undermining”: possibilities for global cooperation to improve environmental protection in areas beyond national jurisdiction