Abstract:Some forty years ago, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS) created an unusual regime for states to collectively manage common natural resources on the international seabed beyond national jurisdiction (known as "the Area") through the International Seabed Authority (ISA). In the intervening years, scientists have increasingly been warning about the serious environmental risks of mining seabed minerals. At this pivotal point in time, when states are negotiating whether or not to allow seabed mining, this essay explores the risk of undermining by mining, that is, contravening international marine environmental law and the obligations and responsibilities of states thereunder by allowing commercial mining activities to commence. We argue that allowing seabed mining in the Area at this juncture, when so much about the deep ocean remains unknown, would risk frustrating a host of measures, achievements, and progress to enhance marine environmental protection, particularly in areas beyond national jurisdiction. We begin with an overview of the ISA and its work to date, before discussing potential interactions between seabed mining and marine environmental law and policies, with a particular focus on the new ocean biodiversity agreement. We conclude by urging states to take cognizance of their overarching duty to protect and preserve the marine environment and ensure that all decisions taken with respect to seabed mining are consistent with their obligations and responsibilities under international law.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The core issues that this paper attempts to address are the potential threats of deep - sea mining activities to international marine environmental law and whether commercial - scale deep - sea mining should be allowed under the current scientific knowledge and legal framework. Specifically, the article explores the following key issues: 1. **Environmental Risks of Deep - Sea Mining**: Scientists warn that deep - sea mining may bring about serious and irreversible environmental impacts, such as destroying deep - sea ecosystems and biodiversity hotspots. These risks have not been fully evaluated, so there is great uncertainty. 2. **Obligations and Responsibilities in International Marine Environmental Law**: According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the International Seabed Authority (ISA) and its member states are responsible for protecting and conserving the marine environment. If deep - sea mining is allowed, it may violate these international obligations, especially when human understanding of the deep - sea environment is still limited. 3. **Conflicts between Deep - Sea Mining and Marine Environmental Protection Measures**: Deep - sea mining may undermine the progress made in recent years to protect the marine environment, especially in areas outside national jurisdiction. This includes commitments to international agreements such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the Fish Stocks Agreement, and the recently adopted Kunming - Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. 4. **Conflicts between Deep - Sea Mining and Other Marine Uses**: Deep - sea mining may affect other important marine uses, such as bioprospecting of marine genetic resources, which is of great value for medical research and pharmaceutical product development. This "land - use" conflict needs to be carefully managed to ensure the maximum benefits that humans obtain from the deep sea. 5. **Impact of the New Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement**: The BBNJ agreement aims to protect and sustainably use the marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. If the ISA allows large - scale deep - sea mining, it may directly damage the goals of the BBNJ agreement, because mining activities may lead to significant and harmful environmental changes. 6. **Application of the Precautionary Principle**: Given the potential risks of deep - sea mining, the ISA and its member states should follow the precautionary principle and take a cautious attitude, postponing or preventing mining activities until there is sufficient baseline information and a full environmental impact assessment. 7. **Coordination of Legal and Political Obligations**: ISA member states should ensure that their actions in the ISA do not conflict with their obligations under other international governance mechanisms, especially their commitments regarding marine protection. In addition, countries that support deep - sea mining may face domestic legal challenges and political consequences. In conclusion, this paper calls on all countries to carefully consider whether to allow deep - sea mining in the current situation of insufficient scientific knowledge and an imperfect legal framework, and to give priority to fulfilling their existing international obligations to protect the marine environment and promote sustainable development.

Undermining by Mining? Deep Seabed Mining in Light of International Marine Environmental Law

Seabed Mining and Approaches to Governance of the Deep Seabed

Defining “serious harm” to the marine environment in the context of deep-seabed mining

An Overview of Seabed Mining Including the Current State of Development, Environmental Impacts, and Knowledge Gaps

Part I Assessing the UN Institutional Structure for Global Ocean Governance: The UN’s Role in Global Ocean Governance, 3 Advancing the Deep Seabed ‘Mining Code’: Key Environmental Elements of the Regulatory Framework for the Commercial Exploitation of Mineral Resources

Taking Precautionary Approaches to the Governance of Commercial Deep Seabed Mining: Law-Making of International Seabed Authority and Multi-Subject Participation

Assessment of scientific gaps related to the effective environmental management of deep-seabed mining

Regulating Deep Sea Mining

The International Seabed Authority and the United Nations 2030 Agenda for sustainable development

The current status of deep-sea mining governance at the International Seabed Authority

DEEP-SEA mining: Policy options to preserve the last frontier - Lessons from Antarctica’s mineral resource convention

Ecosystem-based Management through the lenses of International Seabed Authority stakeholders: current status, implications, and opportunities for the deep-sea mining regime in the Area

Strengthening the International Seabed Authority's knowledge-base: Addressing uncertainties to enhance decision-making

Joint Development Agreements: Towards Protecting the Marine Environment under International Law

Racing the clock: Recent developments and open environmental regulatory issues at the International Seabed Authority on the eve of deep-sea mining

Implementing adaptive management in deep seabed mining: Legal and institutional challenges

Comprehensive Understanding of Seafloor Disturbance and Environmental Impact Scenarios

Incorporating ecosystem services into environmental management of deep-seabed mining

Area-based management tools to protect unique hydrothermal vents from harmful effects from deep-sea mining: A review of ongoing developments

Could deep-sea mining sustain sustainability? The international seabed authority and the UN 2030 agenda

Self-governance at depth: The international seabed authority and verification culture of the deep-sea mining industry