Abstract:The ocean is threatened by human activities, which undermine the health of its ecosystems. To overcome this scenario, there is a converging understanding that a more encompassing approach, such as Ecosystem-based Management (EBM), is essential to manage human activities. EBM implementation in scenarios of limited knowledge and potentially irreversible impacts, such as deep-sea mining (DSM), is thus highly appropriate, although the translation of this approach into practice is not intuitive and rather challenging. The International Seabed Authority (ISA), the organization with the mandate to award exploration and exploitation contracts for minerals on the international seabed, has recognized the need to incorporate EBM in its instruments but has not specified how to implement it. Through an online survey and in-depth interviews, ISA stakeholders have been inquired about their perception of the understanding, current status, implications, and opportunities of EBM for the deep-sea mining regime. The findings reveal that stakeholders perceive EBM as more related to ecological and impact aspects and less with participation, socio-ecological systems interlinks, and other forms of knowledge that are not scientific. Few respondents recognize EBM within the ISA, reporting its reflection in management instruments such as Regional Environmental Management Plans and Environmental Impact Assessments. No common definition exists, regarded as an obstacle to decision-making and EBM operationalization. According to them, opportunities to improve EBM implementation include collaboration with organizations already familiar with EBM, capacity development activities, workshops, and dedicated side events focusing on the issue. Finally, most of them recognize that a lack of consensus regarding EBM can impact decision-making and EBM operationalization, thus compromising ISA's mandate. In this context, the clarification on what EBM entails for the seabed mining regime should be a matter of major interest to the ISA and all its stakeholders, as the mineral resources found in the seabed beyond the limits of national jurisdictions (the Area) are the common heritage of humankind, and therefore, its maintenance and benefits must be ensured to future generations.

Strengthening the International Seabed Authority's knowledge-base: Addressing uncertainties to enhance decision-making

Undermining by Mining? Deep Seabed Mining in Light of International Marine Environmental Law

Implementing adaptive management in deep seabed mining: Legal and institutional challenges

The current status of deep-sea mining governance at the International Seabed Authority

Taking Precautionary Approaches to the Governance of Commercial Deep Seabed Mining: Law-Making of International Seabed Authority and Multi-Subject Participation

Self-governance at depth: The international seabed authority and verification culture of the deep-sea mining industry

Ecosystem-based Management through the lenses of International Seabed Authority stakeholders: current status, implications, and opportunities for the deep-sea mining regime in the Area

Revisiting procedural requirements for the assessment of environmental impacts arising from the different stages of deep seabed mining: Current practices at the International Seabed Authority and recommendations for improvement

Assessment of scientific gaps related to the effective environmental management of deep-seabed mining

Seabed Mining and Approaches to Governance of the Deep Seabed

Does the Regime Secure the Common Heritage’s Benefit-sharing and Marine Environmental Protection Components?

DEEP-SEA mining: Policy options to preserve the last frontier - Lessons from Antarctica’s mineral resource convention

Part I Assessing the UN Institutional Structure for Global Ocean Governance: The UN’s Role in Global Ocean Governance, 3 Advancing the Deep Seabed ‘Mining Code’: Key Environmental Elements of the Regulatory Framework for the Commercial Exploitation of Mineral Resources

Addressing Fundamental Uncertainty in Benefit–Cost Analysis: The Case of Deep Seabed Mining

The two-year deadline to complete the International Seabed Authority’s Mining Code: Key outstanding matters that still need to be resolved

Governing deep sea mining in the face of uncertainty

An Overview of Seabed Mining Including the Current State of Development, Environmental Impacts, and Knowledge Gaps

Area-based management tools to protect unique hydrothermal vents from harmful effects from deep-sea mining: A review of ongoing developments

Defining “serious harm” to the marine environment in the context of deep-seabed mining

Racing the clock: Recent developments and open environmental regulatory issues at the International Seabed Authority on the eve of deep-sea mining

Recognition of ecosystem-based management principles in key documents of the seabed mining regime: implications and further recommendations