Abstract:Traditionally, molecular disorder has been viewed as local or global instability. Molecules or regions displaying disorder have been considered inherently unstructured. The term has been routinely applied to cases for which no atomic coordinates can be derived from crystallized molecules. Yet, even when it appears that the molecules are disordered, prevailing conformations exist, with population times higher than those of all alternate conformations. Disordered molecules are the outcome of rugged energy landscapes away from the native state around the bottom of the funnel. Ruggedness has a biological function, creating a distribution of structured conformers that bind via conformational selection, driving association and multimolecular complex formation, whether chain-linked in. folding or unlinked in binding. We classify disordered molecules into two types. The first type possesses a hydrophobic core. Here, even if the native conformation is unstable, it still has a large enough population time, enabling its experimental detection. In the second type, no such hydrophobic core exists. Hence, the native conformations of molecules belonging to this category have shorter population times, hindering their experimental detection. Although there is a continuum of distribution of hydrophobic cores in proteins, an empirical, statistically based hydrophobicity function may be used as a guideline for distinguishing the two disordered molecule types. Furthermore, the two types relate to steps in the protein folding reaction. With respect to protein design, this leads us to propose that engineering-optimized specific electrostatic interactions to avoid electrostatic repulsion would reduce the type I disordered state, driving the molten globule (MG) --> native (N) state. In contrast, for overcoming the type II disordered state, in addition to specific interactions, a stronger hydrophobic core is also indicated, leading to the denatured --> MG --> N state. Proteins 2001;44:418-427. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Stereochemistry in the disorder–order continuum of protein interactions

The importance of stereochemistry in the disorder-order continuum of protein-protein interactions

The complexity of protein interactions unravelled from structural disorder

Structured Disorder and Conformational Selection

Do Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Possess High Specificity in Proteinprotein Interactions?

Interplay Between Binding Affinity and Kinetics in Protein–protein Interactions

Order/Disorder Transitions Upon Protein Binding: A Unifying Perspective

Stereodivergent Chirality Transfer by Noncovalent Control of Disulfide Bonds

On the Origins of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Intrinsic disorder and allosteric regulation

Identifying Sequence Effects on Chain Dimensions of Disordered Proteins by Integrating Experiments and Simulations

Advantages of Proteins Being Disordered

A Comprehensive Ensemble Model for Comparing the Allosteric Effect of Ordered and Disordered Proteins.

Effective concentrations enforced by intrinsically disordered linkers are governed by polymer physics

One- and two-proton transfer reactions with vibrational Nuclei

Toward A Quantitative Theory of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Their Function

Identification of Intrinsic Disorder in Complexes from the Protein Data Bank

Chirality-selected phase behaviour in ionic polypeptide complexes

Super Spy variants implicate flexibility in chaperone action.

Frustration in Fuzzy Protein Complexes Leads to Interaction Versatility

Influence of stereochemistry in a local approach for calculating protein conformations