Abstract:The idea that structural disorder might be a novel mechanism of protein interaction is widespread in the Literature, although the number of statistically significant structural studies supporting this is surprisingly low. At variance with previous works, our conclusions rely exclusively on a large-scale analysis of all the 134337 X-ray crystallographic structures of the Protein Data Bank averaged over clusters of almost identical protein sequences. In this work, we explore the complexity of the organization of all the interaction interfaces observed when a protein lies in alternative complexes, showing that interfaces progressively add up in a hierarchical way. We further investigate the connection of this complexity with different measures of structural disorder: the standard missing residues and a new definition, called "soft disorder", that covers all the flexible and structurally amorphous residues of a protein. We show evidences that both the interaction interfaces and the soft disordered regions tend to involve roughly the same amino-acids of the protein, and preliminary results suggesting that soft disorder spots those surface regions where new interfaces are progressively accommodated by complex formation. Our results suggest that disordered regions not only carry crucial information about the location of alternative interfaces within complexes, but also of the order of the assembly. We verify these hypotheses in several examples. We finally compare our measures of disorder with several disorder predictors, showing that these latter are optimized to predict the residues that are missing in all the alternative structures of a protein, and they are not able to catch the progressive evolution of the disordered regions upon complex formation. Yet, the predicted residues, if not missing, tend to be characterized as soft disordered.

The importance of stereochemistry in the disorder-order continuum of protein-protein interactions

Stereochemistry in the disorder–order continuum of protein interactions

The complexity of protein interactions unravelled from structural disorder

Do Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Possess High Specificity in Proteinprotein Interactions?

Stereodivergent Chirality Transfer by Noncovalent Control of Disulfide Bonds

Interplay Between Binding Affinity and Kinetics in Protein–protein Interactions

On the Origins of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

One- and two-proton transfer reactions with vibrational Nuclei

Order/Disorder Transitions Upon Protein Binding: A Unifying Perspective

Theoretical Investigation of the Lack of Chiral Self-Sorting Behaviour of a Molecular Cinquefoil Knot

Importance of Electrostatic Interactions in the Association of Intrinsically Disordered Histone Chaperone Chz1 and Histone H2A.Z-H2B.

A Comprehensive Ensemble Model for Comparing the Allosteric Effect of Ordered and Disordered Proteins.

Advantages of Proteins Being Disordered

Intrinsic disorder and allosteric regulation

Selective chiral symmetry breaking: when 'Left' and 'Right' cannot coexist and 'Left' is the best option

Influence of stereochemistry in a local approach for calculating protein conformations

Toward A Quantitative Theory of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins and Their Function

Handedness preference and switching of peptide helices. Part I: Helices based on protein amino acids

Mirror-image antiparallel β-sheets organize water molecules into superstructures of opposite chirality

Molecular Driving Force of a Small Molecule-Induced Protein Disorder-Order Transition

More is Simpler: Decomposition of Ligand-Binding Affinity for Proteins Being Disordered