Optimizing Virtual Nature for Psychological and Physiological Well-Being: A Systematic Review of the Moderating Effects of Duration, Nature Type, Sample Characteristics, and Immersiveness and Potential Risks of Bias
Ahmad BoloukiOlivia McAnirlinMatthew H. E. M. BrowningAllison Maynarda School of Architecture and Urban Planning,University of Art,Tehran,Iranb Virtual Reality & Nature Lab,Clemson University,Clemson,SC,USAAhmad Bolouki is a researcher specializing in nature-based solutions for human well-being and sustainable built environments. He explores innovative applications of cutting-edge technologies,such as virtual reality and artificial intelligence,in this context. He holds a master's degree in urban design from the Tehran University of Art.Olivia McAnirlin is Co-Director of the Virtual Reality & Nature Lab and adjunct faculty in the Department of Parks,Recreation and Tourism Management at Clemson University. Her research interests include studying the psychological and physiological impacts of nature and virtual reality and using virtual reality as a form of storytelling.Matthew H. E. M. Browning is Co-Director of the Virtual Reality & Nature Lab and Associate Professor in the Department of Parks,Recreation and Tourism Management at Clemson University. His research focuses on the measurement,mechanisms,and implementation of nature-based interventions for health promotion,using both virtual reality and urban greening.Allison Maynard a Ph.D. student at Clemson University in the Parks,Recreation,and Tourism Management program,specializes in environmental education,informal learning,and immersive technologies. She holds a master's in Child and Youth Development from Brock University and explores innovative technology applications in informal education settings.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2338327
IF: 4.92
2024-04-17
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Abstract:Virtual nature research has emerged as a prominent and captivating study area, gaining much attention for its profound potential to enhance well-being. This literature review aimed to expand prior reviews of virtual nature experiences on psychological and physiological well-being in two ways: summarizing how four factors may moderate the beneficial effects of virtual nature and reporting the risk of bias in this body of literature. Searches for peer-reviewed research articles were conducted in Web of Science and Scopus and manually identified, returning 78 relevant empirical studies published between 2010 and 2023. The assessment of bias was conducted utilizing Cochrane's RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. The four moderators examined were duration of exposure (i.e., ≤5 min, 5–10 min, ≥10 min), type of virtual nature (i.e., green space, blue space), sample characteristics (i.e., age, health status), and immersion level (i.e., virtual reality [VR], 2D screens). We found limited evidence for the impact of the first three moderators but stronger evidence for higher levels of immersion showing stronger benefits. All studies were found to have a moderate to high risk of bias, mostly related to the subjective measurement of outcomes. Future research should prioritize studying tailored virtual nature interventions and their long-term effects among diverse participants and different types of virtual environments, as well as investigating the influence of presence and immersion levels in virtual settings. These efforts will provide further insights into the underlying mechanisms of the benefits derived from virtual nature exposure.
computer science, cybernetics,ergonomics