Restorative effects of virtual natural settings on middle-aged and elderly adults

Chia-Pin Yu,Hsiao-Yun Lee,Wen-Hsin Lu,Yu-Chih Huang,Matthew H.E.M. Browning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126863

2020-12-01

Abstract:<p>Previous studies have demonstrated health benefits result from exposure to natural environments. Virtual reality (VR) may offer an alternative to actual outdoor immersion by generating a simulated health-promoting environment. Given that health issues are more prevalent in older adults, this study investigated the restorative effects of VR natural settings on middle-aged and elderly individuals. A cross-over pretest-posttest design was used to measure changes in participants' mood levels, physiological and psychological responses, and attentional measures of cognitive functioning (N = 34). Semi-structured interviews after the VR experiences were conducted to evaluate participants' experiences. Physiological responses to VR did not differ between virtual natural and urban settings. In contrast, participants expressed more positive feelings and lower levels of fatigue and depression after viewing virtual nature settings than after viewing virtual urban settings. Virtual nature settings were also rated as more restorativeness than virtual urban settings. Further, participants described virtual natural settings as appeasing and relaxing, so much so that they were motivated to travel outdoors to experience the settings shown in VR. Our findings provide additional evidence that viewing simulated natural settings in VR can be beneficial for this population. Perhaps the most promising finding is that VR may motivate older adults to experience nature outdoors, thus promoting synergistic benefits first during virtual exposure and then during actual exposure.</p>

environmental studies,urban studies,forestry

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Problems Addressed by the Papers

#### Paper 1: Economic Burden Analysis of IBS Patients
- **Problem**: How does the economic burden on employers differ between IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome) patients and the control group in terms of medical and medication usage and absenteeism due to illness?
- **Conclusion**: IBS patients consume more resources in medical and medication usage and have longer absenteeism due to illness, resulting in a significant economic burden on employers.

#### Paper 2: Cost Analysis of Diagnosing and Treating Pouchitis Symptoms
- **Problem**: How do different diagnostic and treatment strategies perform in terms of cost and cost-effectiveness?
- **Method**: A decision analysis model was used to evaluate five strategies: empirical use of metronidazole, empirical use of ciprofloxacin, using metronidazole first and then ciprofloxacin for non-responders, endoscopy with histological examination, and endoscopy without histological examination.
- **Results**: Empirical use of metronidazole was the most economical strategy ($216), while endoscopy without histological examination, although slightly more expensive ($228), allowed for diagnosis and treatment 7 days earlier, offering higher cost-effectiveness.
- **Conclusion**: Empirical use of metronidazole is the most economical strategy, but endoscopy without histological examination, due to significantly shorter diagnosis and treatment time and relatively low additional cost, can be considered the most cost-effective strategy.

#### Paper 3: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitors (IV PPI) in the Treatment of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding
- **Problem**: Is the routine use of intravenous proton pump inhibitors (IV PPI) from the initial presentation to endoscopy cost-effective for all upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients?
- **Method**: A decision tree model was used to evaluate two strategies: using IV PPI after endoscopy and starting IV PPI at the initial presentation for all patients until endoscopy.
- **Results**: In the base analysis, using IV PPI after endoscopy was the most cost-effective strategy, with an average cost of $2,743 CAD per patient for preventing rebleeding. This conclusion held under various clinical assumptions, even assuming certain types of lesions benefit more.
- **Conclusion**: Using IV PPI after endoscopy is more cost-effective than starting IV PPI at the initial presentation for all patients.