Abstract:The World Health Organization (WHO) released a series of mythbuster infographics to combat misinformation during the COVID-19 infodemic. While the corrective effects of such debunking interventions have typically been examined in the immediate aftermath of intervention delivery; the durability of these corrective effects and their resilience against subsequent misinformation remains poorly understood. To this end, we asked younger and older adults to rate the truthfulness and credibility of 10 statements containing misinformation about common COVID-19 myths, as well as their willingness to share the statements through social media. They did this three times, before and after experimental interventions within a single study session. In keeping with established findings, exposure to the WHO's myth-busting infographics-(a) improved participants' ratings of the misinformation statements as untruthful and uncredible and (b) reduced their reported willingness to share the statements. However, within-subject data revealed these beneficial effects were diminished if corrective information was presented shortly by misinformation, but the effects remained when further corrective information was presented. Throughout the study, younger adults rated the misinformation statements as more truthful and credible and were more willing to share them. Our data reveal that the benefit of COVID-19 debunking interventions may be short-lived if followed shortly by misinformation. Still, the effect can be maintained in the presence of further corrective information. These outcomes provide insights into the effectiveness and durability of corrective information and can influence strategies for tackling health-related misinformation, especially in younger adults.

The effectiveness of misinformation corrective strategies and implications for consumers' food preferences and policy attitudes

Debunking Misinformation About Genetically Modified Food Safety on Social Media: Can Heuristic Cues Mitigate Biased Assimilation?

Do information disputes work: the effect of perceived risk, news disputes and credibility on consumer attitudes and trust toward biotechnology companies

A Mild Approach to Prebunking Health Misinformation in Social Media: Digital Nudging

Prebunking Design as a Defense Mechanism Against Misinformation Propagation on Social Networks

228 Food for Thought: How Influenceable Is the Next Generation Consumer

Why fall for misinformation? Role of information processing strategies, health consciousness, and overconfidence in health literacy

Enhancing misinformation correction: New variants and a combination of awareness training and counter-speech to mitigate belief perseverance bias

The effectiveness of refutation text in confronting scientific misconceptions: A meta-analysis

The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction

Fighting misinformation on social media: effects of evidence type and presentation mode

Modifying Knowledge, Emotions, and Attitudes Regarding Genetically Modified Foods

Processing of misinformation as motivational and cognitive biases

The Game Theory of Fake News

One Dose Is Not Enough: The Beneficial Effect of Corrective COVID-19 Information Is Diminished If Followed by Misinformation

A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation

Investigating the role of source and source trust in prebunks and debunks of misinformation in online experiments across four EU countries

Media Literacy Interventions Improve Resilience to Misinformation: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Overall Effect and Moderating Factors

Misconceptions and meat: The impact of new knowledge on meat demand

Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation Through an Online Game Based on the Inoculation Theory: Analyzing the Mediating Effects of Perceived Threat and Persuasion Knowledge

Game-based inoculation versus graphic-based inoculation to combat misinformation: a randomized controlled trial