Abstract:When users on social media share content without considering its veracity, they may unwittingly be spreading misinformation. In this work, we investigate the design of lightweight interventions that nudge users to assess the accuracy of information as they share it. Such assessment may deter users from posting misinformation in the first place, and their assessments may also provide useful guidance to friends aiming to assess those posts themselves. In support of lightweight assessment, we first develop a taxonomy of the reasons why people believe a news claim is or is not true; this taxonomy yields a checklist that can be used at posting time. We conduct evaluations to demonstrate that the checklist is an accurate and comprehensive encapsulation of people's free-response rationales. In a second experiment, we study the effects of three behavioral nudges -- 1) checkboxes indicating whether headings are accurate, 2) tagging reasons (from our taxonomy) that a post is accurate via a checklist and 3) providing free-text rationales for why a headline is or is not accurate -- on people's intention of sharing the headline on social media. From an experiment with 1668 participants, we find that both providing accuracy assessment and rationale reduce the sharing of false content. They also reduce the sharing of true content, but to a lesser degree that yields an overall decrease in the fraction of shared content that is false. Our findings have implications for designing social media and news sharing platforms that draw from richer signals of content credibility contributed by users. In addition, our validated taxonomy can be used by platforms and researchers as a way to gather rationales in an easier fashion than free-response.

Prebunking Design as a Defense Mechanism Against Misinformation Propagation on Social Networks

A Mild Approach to Prebunking Health Misinformation in Social Media: Digital Nudging

A Persuasive Approach to Combating Misinformation

Designing Policies for Truth: Combating Misinformation with Transparency and Information Design

Exploring Lightweight Interventions at Posting Time to Reduce the Sharing of Misinformation on Social Media

Prevalence and Propagation of Fake News

Three prophylactic interventions to counter fake news on social media

Who should fight the spread of fake news?

Psychological inoculation protects against the social media infodemic

Measuring receptivity to misinformation at scale on a social media platform

Mitigating Disinformation in Social Networks through Noise

Trustworthy Misinformation Mitigation with Soft Information Nudging

Battling the Coronavirus Infodemic Among Social Media Users in Kenya and Nigeria

Intervention strategies for misinformation sharing on social media: A bibliometric analysis

Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation

Battling the coronavirus 'infodemic' among social media users in Kenya and Nigeria

Investigating the role of source and source trust in prebunks and debunks of misinformation in online experiments across four EU countries

A Bayesian Model for False Information Belief Impact, Optimal Design, and Fake News Containment

Probabilistic Social Learning Improves the Public's Detection of Misinformation

Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention

Beyond Uniform Reverse Sampling: A Hybrid Sampling Technique for Misinformation Prevention