Seasonal changes in ovarian state in a eusocial halictine bee,Lasioglossum duplex, based on stages of the oldest oocytes in each ovariole (Hymenoptera: Halictidae)

K. Gôukon,Y. Maeta,S. Sakagami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02538890

1987-12-01

Researches on Population Ecology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism

Emma Hoes,Brian Aitken,Jingwen Zhang,Tomasz Gackowski,Magdalena Wojcieszak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01884-x

IF: 24.252

2024-06-11

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:Current interventions to combat misinformation, including fact-checking, media literacy tips and media coverage of misinformation, may have unintended consequences for democracy. We propose that these interventions may increase scepticism towards all information, including accurate information. Across three online survey experiments in three diverse countries (the United States, Poland and Hong Kong; total n = 6,127), we tested the negative spillover effects of existing strategies and compared them with three alternative interventions against misinformation. We examined how exposure to fact-checking, media literacy tips and media coverage of misinformation affects individuals' perception of both factual and false information, as well as their trust in key democratic institutions. Our results show that while all interventions successfully reduce belief in false information, they also negatively impact the credibility of factual information. This highlights the need for further improved strategies that minimize the harms and maximize the benefits of interventions against misinformation.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
Source-credibility information and social norms improve truth discernment and reduce engagement with misinformation online

Toby Prike,Lucy H. Butler,Ullrich K. H. Ecker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57560-7

IF: 4.6

2024-03-24

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Misinformation on social media is a pervasive challenge. In this study ( N = 415) a social-media simulation was used to test two potential interventions for countering misinformation: a credibility badge and a social norm. The credibility badge was implemented by associating accounts, including participants', with a credibility score. Participants' credibility score was dynamically updated depending on their engagement with true and false posts. To implement the social-norm intervention, participants were provided with both a descriptive norm (i.e., most people do not share misinformation) and an injunctive norm (i.e., sharing misinformation is the wrong thing to do). Both interventions were effective. The social-norm intervention led to reduced belief in false claims and improved discrimination between true and false claims. It also had some positive impact on social-media engagement, although some effects were not robust to alternative analysis specifications. The presence of credibility badges led to greater belief in true claims, lower belief in false claims, and improved discrimination. The credibility-badge intervention also had robust positive impacts on social-media engagement, leading to increased flagging and decreased liking and sharing of false posts. Cumulatively, the results suggest that both interventions have potential to combat misinformation and improve the social-media information landscape.

multidisciplinary sciences
Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation

Melisa Basol,Jon Roozenbeek,Manon Berriche,Fatih Uenal,William P. McClanahan,Sander van der Linden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013868

2021-01-01

Abstract:Misinformation about the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is a pressing societal challenge. Across two studies, one preregistered ( n 1 = 1771 and n 2 = 1777), we assess the efficacy of two ‘prebunking’ interventions aimed at improving people’s ability to spot manipulation techniques commonly used in COVID-19 misinformation across three different languages (English, French and German). We find that Go Viral!, a novel five-minute browser game, (a) increases the perceived manipulativeness of misinformation about COVID-19, (b) improves people’s attitudinal certainty (confidence) in their ability to spot misinformation and (c) reduces self-reported willingness to share misinformation with others. The first two effects remain significant for at least one week after gameplay. We also find that reading real-world infographics from UNESCO improves people’s ability and confidence in spotting COVID-19 misinformation (albeit with descriptively smaller effect sizes than the game). Limitations and implications for fake news interventions are discussed.

social sciences, interdisciplinary
Don't believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation

Ullrich K H Ecker,Toby Prike,Antonia B Paver,Rosie J Scott,Briony Swire-Thompson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00581-7

2024-08-26

Abstract:Misinformation often continues to influence people's reasoning even after it has been corrected. Therefore, an important aim of applied cognition research is to identify effective measures to counter misinformation. One frequently recommended but hitherto insufficiently tested strategy is source discreditation, that is, attacking the credibility of a misinformation source. In two experiments, we tested whether immediate source discreditation could reduce people's subsequent reliance on fictional event-related misinformation. In Experiment 1, the discreditation targeted a person source of misinformation, pointing to a conflict of interest. This intervention was compared with a commonly employed message-focused correction and a combination of correction and discreditation. The discreditation alone was effective, but less effective than a correction, with the combination of both most effective. Experiment 2 compared discreditations that targeted a person versus a media source of misinformation, pointing either to a conflict of interest or a poor track record of communication. Discreditations were effective for both types of sources, although track-record discreditations were less effective when the misinformation source was a media outlet compared to a person. Results demonstrate that continued influence of misinformation is shaped by social as well as cognitive factors and that source discreditation is a broadly applicable misinformation countermeasure.
Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation

Anastasia Kozyreva,Philipp Lorenz-Spreen,Stefan M. Herzog,Ullrich K. H. Ecker,Stephan Lewandowsky,Ralph Hertwig,Ayesha Ali,Joe Bak-Coleman,Sarit Barzilai,Melisa Basol,Adam J. Berinsky,Cornelia Betsch,John Cook,Lisa K. Fazio,Michael Geers,Andrew M. Guess,Haifeng Huang,Horacio Larreguy,Rakoen Maertens,Folco Panizza,Gordon Pennycook,David G. Rand,Steve Rathje,Jason Reifler,Philipp Schmid,Mark Smith,Briony Swire-Thompson,Paula Szewach,Sander van der Linden,Sam Wineburg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01881-0

IF: 24.252

2024-05-14

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:The spread of misinformation through media and social networks threatens many aspects of society, including public health and the state of democracies. One approach to mitigating the effect of misinformation focuses on individual-level interventions, equipping policymakers and the public with essential tools to curb the spread and influence of falsehoods. Here we introduce a toolbox of individual-level interventions for reducing harm from online misinformation. Comprising an up-to-date account of interventions featured in 81 scientific papers from across the globe, the toolbox provides both a conceptual overview of nine main types of interventions, including their target, scope and examples, and a summary of the empirical evidence supporting the interventions, including the methods and experimental paradigms used to test them. The nine types of interventions covered are accuracy prompts, debunking and rebuttals, friction, inoculation, lateral reading and verification strategies, media-literacy tips, social norms, source-credibility labels, and warning and fact-checking labels.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents

Antonio A. Arechar,Jennifer Allen,Adam J. Berinsky,Rocky Cole,Ziv Epstein,Kiran Garimella,Andrew Gully,Jackson G. Lu,Robert M. Ross,Michael N. Stagnaro,Yunhao Zhang,Gordon Pennycook,David G. Rand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01641-6

IF: 24.252

2023-07-01

Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract:The spread of misinformation online is a global problem that requires global solutions. To that end, we conducted an experiment in 16 countries across 6 continents ( N = 34,286; 676,605 observations) to investigate predictors of susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19, and interventions to combat the spread of this misinformation. In every country, participants with a more analytic cognitive style and stronger accuracy-related motivations were better at discerning truth from falsehood; valuing democracy was also associated with greater truth discernment, whereas endorsement of individual responsibility over government support was negatively associated with truth discernment in most countries. Subtly prompting people to think about accuracy had a generally positive effect on the veracity of news that people were willing to share across countries, as did minimal digital literacy tips. Finally, aggregating the ratings of our non-expert participants was able to differentiate true from false headlines with high accuracy in all countries via the 'wisdom of crowds'. The consistent patterns we observe suggest that the psychological factors underlying the misinformation challenge are similar across different regional settings, and that similar solutions may be broadly effective.

psychology, experimental,neurosciences,multidisciplinary sciences
The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility

Cecilie S. Traberg,Trisha Harjani,Jon Roozenbeek,Sander van der Linden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54030-y

IF: 4.6

2024-02-21

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Although misinformation exposure takes place within a social context, significant conclusions have been drawn about misinformation susceptibility through studies that largely examine judgements in a social vacuum. Bridging the gap between social influence research and the cognitive science of misinformation, we examine the mechanisms through which social context impacts misinformation susceptibility across 5 experiments ( N = 20,477). We find that social cues only impact individual judgements when they influence perceptions of wider social consensus, and that source similarity only biases news consumers when the source is high in credibility. Specifically, high and low engagement cues ('likes') reduced misinformation susceptibility relative to a control, and endorsement cues increased susceptibility, but discrediting cues had no impact. Furthermore, political ingroup sources increased susceptibility if the source was high in credibility, but political outgroup sources had no effect relative to a control. This work highlights the importance of studying cognitive processes within a social context, as judgements of (mis)information change when embedded in the social world. These findings further underscore the need for multifaceted interventions that take account of the social context in which false information is processed to effectively mitigate the impact of misinformation on the public.

multidisciplinary sciences
Separating truth from lies: comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands

Michael Hameleers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764603

2020-05-19

Information, Communication and Society

Abstract:Although previous research has offered important insights into the consequences of mis- and disinformation and the effectiveness of corrective information, we know markedly less about how different types of corrective information – news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers – can be combined to counter different forms of misinformation. Against this backdrop, this paper reports on experiments in the US and the Netherlands ( N = 1,091) that exposed people to evidence-based or fact-free anti-immigration misinformation, fact-checkers and/or a media literacy intervention. The main findings indicate that evidence-based misinformation is seen as more accurate than fact-free misinformation, and the combination of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers is most effective in lowering issue agreement and perceived accuracy of misinformation across countries. These findings have important implications for journalism practice and policy makers that aim to combat mis- and disinformation.
Measuring receptivity to misinformation at scale on a social media platform

Christopher K Tokita,Kevin Aslett,William P Godel,Zeve Sanderson,Joshua A Tucker,Jonathan Nagler,Nathaniel Persily,Richard Bonneau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae396

2024-09-10

PNAS Nexus

Abstract:Measuring the impact of online misinformation is challenging. Traditional measures, such as user views or shares on social media, are incomplete because not everyone who is exposed to misinformation is equally likely to believe it. To address this issue, we developed a method that combines survey data with observational Twitter data to probabilistically estimate the number of users both exposed to and likely to believe a specific news story. As a proof of concept, we applied this method to 139 viral news articles and find that although false news reaches an audience with diverse political views, users who are both exposed and receptive to believing false news tend to have more extreme ideologies. These receptive users are also more likely to encounter misinformation earlier than those who are unlikely to believe it. This mismatch between overall user exposure and receptive user exposure underscores the limitation of relying solely on exposure or interaction data to measure the impact of misinformation, as well as the challenge of implementing effective interventions. To demonstrate how our approach can address this challenge, we then conducted data-driven simulations of common interventions used by social media platforms. We find that these interventions are only modestly effective at reducing exposure among users likely to believe misinformation, and their effectiveness quickly diminishes unless implemented soon after misinformation's initial spread. Our paper provides a more precise estimate of misinformation's impact by focusing on the exposure of users likely to believe it, offering insights for effective mitigation strategies on social media.
How can we combat online misinformation? A systematic overview of current interventions and their efficacy

Pica Johansson,Florence Enock,Scott Hale,Bertie Vidgen,Cassidy Bereskin,Helen Margetts,Jonathan Bright

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.11864

2022-12-23

Abstract:The spread of misinformation is a pressing global problem that has elicited a range of responses from researchers, policymakers, civil society and industry. Over the past decade, these stakeholders have developed many interventions to tackle misinformation that vary across factors such as which effects of misinformation they hope to target, at what stage in the misinformation lifecycle they are aimed at, and who they are implemented by. These interventions also differ in how effective they are at reducing susceptibility to (and curbing the spread of) misinformation. In recent years, a vast amount of scholarly work on misinformation has become available, which extends across multiple disciplines and methodologies. It has become increasingly difficult to comprehensively map all of the available interventions, assess their efficacy, and understand the challenges, opportunities and tradeoffs associated with using them. Few papers have systematically assessed and compared the various interventions, which has led to a lack of understanding in civic and policymaking discourses. With this in mind, we develop a new hierarchical framework for understanding interventions against misinformation online. The framework comprises three key elements: Interventions that Prepare people to be less susceptible; Interventions that Curb the spread and effects of misinformation; and Interventions that Respond to misinformation. We outline how different interventions are thought to work, categorise them, and summarise the available evidence on their efficacy; offering researchers, policymakers and practitioners working to combat online misinformation both an analytical framework that they can use to understand and evaluate different interventions (and which could be extended to address new interventions that we do not describe here) and a summary of the range of interventions that have been proposed to date.

Computers and Society
A Comparative Evaluation of Interventions Against Misinformation: Augmenting the WHO Checklist

Hendrik Heuer,Elena Leah Glassman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517717

2022-12-14

Abstract:During the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization provided a checklist to help people distinguish between accurate and misinformation. In controlled experiments in the United States and Germany, we investigated the utility of this ordered checklist and designed an interactive version to lower the cost of acting on checklist items. Across interventions, we observe non-trivial differences in participants' performance in distinguishing accurate and misinformation between the two countries and discuss some possible reasons that may predict the future helpfulness of the checklist in different environments. The checklist item that provides source labels was most frequently followed and was considered most helpful. Based on our empirical findings, we recommend practitioners focus on providing source labels rather than interventions that support readers performing their own fact-checks, even though this recommendation may be influenced by the WHO's chosen order. We discuss the complexity of providing such source labels and provide design recommendations.

Human-Computer Interaction,Computers and Society
Psychological interventions countering misinformation in social media: A scoping review

Paweł Gwiaździński,Aleksander B. Gundersen,Michal Piksa,Izabela Krysińska,Jonas R. Kunst,Karolina Noworyta,Agata Olejniuk,Mikołaj Morzy,Rafal Rygula,Tomi Wójtowicz,Jan Piasecki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974782

IF: 4.7

2023-01-06

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Introduction: The rise of social media users and the explosive growth in misinformation shared across social media platforms have become a serious threat to democratic discourse and public health. The mentioned implications have increased the demand for misinformation detection and intervention. To contribute to this challenge, we are presenting a systematic scoping review of psychological interventions countering misinformation in social media. The review was conducted to (i) identify and map evidence on psychological interventions countering misinformation, (ii) compare the viability of the interventions on social media, and (iii) provide guidelines for the development of effective interventions. Methods: A systematic search in three bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Scopus) and additional searches in Google Scholar and reference lists were conducted. Results: 3,561. records were identified, 75. of which met the eligibility criteria for the inclusion in the final review. The psychological interventions identified during the review can be classified into three categories distinguished by Kozyreva et al.: Boosting, Technocognition, and Nudging, and then into 15. types within these. Most of the studied interventions were not implemented and tested in a real social media environment but under strictly controlled settings or online crowdsourcing platforms. The presented feasibility assessment of implementation insights expressed qualitatively and with numerical scoring could guide the development of future interventions that can be successfully implemented on social media platforms. Discussion: The review provides the basis for further research on psychological interventions counteracting misinformation. Future research on interventions should aim to combine effective Technocognition and Nudging in the user experience of online services. Systematic review registration: [https://figshare.com/], identifier [https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14649432.v2].

psychiatry
Softly empowering a prosocial expert in the family: lasting effects of a counter-misinformation intervention in an informational autocracy

Gábor Orosz,Laura Faragó,Benedek Paskuj,Zsófia Rakovics,Diane Sam-Mine,Gilles Audemard,Mouny Samy Modeliar,Péter Krekó

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61232-x

IF: 4.6

2024-05-25

Scientific Reports

Abstract:The present work is the first to comprehensively analyze the gravity of the misinformation problem in Hungary, where misinformation appears regularly in the pro-governmental, populist, and socially conservative mainstream media. In line with international data, using a Hungarian representative sample (Study 1, N = 991), we found that voters of the reigning populist, conservative party could hardly distinguish fake from real news. In Study 2, we demonstrated that a prosocial intervention of ~ 10 min ( N = 801) helped young adult participants discern misinformation four weeks later compared to the control group without implementing any boosters. This effect was the most salient regarding pro-governmental conservative fake news content, leaving real news evaluations intact. Although the hypotheses of the present work were not preregistered, it appears that prosocial misinformation interventions might be promising attempts to counter misinformation in an informational autocracy in which the media is highly centralized. Despite using social motivations, it does not mean that long-term cognitive changes cannot occur. Future studies might explore exactly how these interventions can have an impact on the long-term cognitive processing of news content as well as their underlying neural structures.

multidisciplinary sciences
Misinformation interventions decay rapidly without an immediate posttest

Georgia Capewell,Rakoen Maertens,Miriam Remshard,Sander van der Linden,Josh Compton,Stephan Lewandowsky,Jon Roozenbeek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13049

2024-06-23

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract:In recent years, many kinds of interventions have been developed that seek to reduce susceptibility to misinformation. In two preregistered longitudinal studies (N1 = 503, N2 = 673), we leverage two previously validated "inoculation" interventions (a video and a game) to address two important questions in misinformation interventions research: (1) whether displaying additional stimuli (such as videos unrelated to misinformation) alongside an intervention interferes with its effectiveness, and (2) whether administering an immediate posttest (in the form of a social media post evaluation task after the intervention) plays a role in the longevity of the intervention. We find no evidence that other stimuli interfere with intervention efficacy, but strong evidence that immediate posttests strengthen the learnings from the intervention. In study 1, we find that 48 h after watching a video, participants who received an immediate posttest continued to be significantly better at discerning untrustworthy social media posts from neutral ones than the control group (d = 0.416, p = .007), whereas participants who only received a posttest 48 h later showed no differences with a control (d = 0.010, p = .854). In study 2, we observe highly similar results for a gamified intervention, and provide evidence for a causal mechanism: immediate posttests help strengthen people's memory of the lessons learned in the intervention. We argue that the active rehearsal and application of relevant information are therefore requirements for the longevity of learning‐based misinformation interventions, which has substantial implications for their scalability.

psychology, social
Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news media

Michael Hameleers,Anna Brosius,Claes H de Vreese

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211072667

2022-02-11

European Journal of Communication

Abstract:This study tests how perceptions of misinformation and disinformation in one’s general news media environment relate to media trust and media consumption patterns, relying on survey data from 10 European countries. The results show that perceptions of misinformation and disinformation are both related to reduced trust in the news media. Furthermore, they go hand in hand with reduced consumption of traditional TV news, but with no changes in newspaper and (mainstream) online news use. Finally, those with stronger perceptions of misinformation and disinformation are more likely to consume news on social media and alternative, non-mainstream outlets. This pattern is stronger for those with higher perceptions of disinformation. These findings indicate that news users who distrust the veracity and honesty of the news media may turn to alternative outlets that reflect anti-establishment worldviews.

communication
A Mild Approach to Prebunking Health Misinformation in Social Media: Digital Nudging

Xinyue Li,Mandie Liu,Jingwen Lian,Qinghua Zhu,Xiaokang Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.938

2023-10-01

Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Abstract:ABSTRACT The governance of health misinformation has been a hot topic in both social practice and academic research. Due to its proactive and timely nature, prebunking represents an emerging and efficacious intervention. However, previous research on prebunking primarily focuses on presenting arguments or techniques to the public in a direct and coercive manner, which remains limited in its scope and efficacy. This study aims to implement prebunking in social media by utilizing a milder approach, namely digital nudging. We conduct a web‐based pre‐experiment to test the effectiveness of warning, social and disclosure nudge, and obtain data from 104 participants. The preliminary results show that the warning and social nudge can mitigate the credibility of misinformation and decrease individual's sharing likelihood. Furthermore, eHealth literacy acts as the moderator in the impact of social nudge. This study broadens the comprehensions of the misinformation governance and digital nudging, and furnishes practical implications for the implementation of prebunking in social media.
The Misleading count: an identity-based intervention to counter partisan misinformation sharing

Clara Pretus,Ali M. Javeed,Diána Hughes,Kobi Hackenburg,Manos Tsakiris,Oscar Vilarroya,Jay J. Van Bavel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0040

2024-01-21

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract:Interventions to counter misinformation are often less effective for polarizing content on social media platforms. We sought to overcome this limitation by testing an identity-based intervention, which aims to promote accuracy by incorporating normative cues directly into the social media user interface. Across three pre-registered experiments in the US ( N = 1709) and UK ( N = 804), we found that crowdsourcing accuracy judgements by adding a Misleading count (next to the Like count) reduced participants' reported likelihood to share inaccurate information about partisan issues by 25% (compared with a control condition). The Misleading count was also more effective when it reflected in-group norms (from fellow Democrats/Republicans) compared with the norms of general users, though this effect was absent in a less politically polarized context (UK). Moreover, the normative intervention was roughly five times as effective as another popular misinformation intervention (i.e. the accuracy nudge reduced sharing misinformation by 5%). Extreme partisanship did not undermine the effectiveness of the intervention. Our results suggest that identity-based interventions based on the science of social norms can be more effective than identity-neutral alternatives to counter partisan misinformation in politically polarized contexts (e.g. the US). This article is part of the theme issue ‘Social norm change: drivers and consequences’.

biology
Determinants of Gullibility to Misinformation: A Study of Climate Change, COVID-19 and Artificial Intelligence

Sven Gruener

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02601079221083482

2022-04-02

Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics

Abstract:This article explores whether susceptibility to misinformation is context-dependent. For this purpose, a survey experiment has been conducted in which subjects from Germany had to rate the reliability of several statements in the fields of climate change, COVID-19 and artificial intelligence. These contexts differed with respect to the frequency of media coverage, population activity in the form of demonstrations, daily number of deaths, and scientific knowledge. We find some similarities (for example, trust in social networks is positively associated with falling for misinformation in all three contexts) but also substantial differences (for example, risk perception as well as the extent to which people consider evidence to adjust their beliefs seem to matter for climate change and COVID-19 but not for artificial intelligence). More systematic work on context-related differences and narratives is required to design adequate measures against misinformation. JEL: C91, D01, D80
"I don't trust them": Exploring Perceptions of Fact-checking Entities for Flagging Online Misinformation

Hana Habib,Sara Elsharawy,Rifat Rahman

2024-10-02

Abstract:The spread of misinformation through online social media platforms has had substantial societal consequences. As a result, platforms have introduced measures to alert users of news content that may be misleading or contain inaccuracies as a means to discourage them from sharing it. These interventions sometimes cite external sources, such as fact-checking organizations and news outlets, for providing assessments related to the accuracy of the content. However, it is unclear whether users trust the assessments provided by these entities and whether perceptions vary across different topics of news. We conducted an online study with 655 US participants to explore user perceptions of eight categories of fact-checking entities across two misinformation topics, as well as factors that may impact users' perceptions. We found that participants' opinions regarding the trustworthiness and bias of the entities varied greatly, aligning largely with their political preference. However, just the presence of a fact-checking label appeared to discourage participants from sharing the headlines studied. Our results hint at the need for further exploring fact-checking entities that may be perceived as neutral, as well as the potential for incorporating multiple assessments in such labels.

Human-Computer Interaction,Computers and Society,Social and Information Networks
Beyond online disinformation: assessing national information resilience in four European countries

Marius Dragomir,José Rúas-Araújo,Minna Horowitz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02605-5

2024-01-14

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Abstract:As social media is a key conduit for the distribution of disinformation, much of the literature on disinformation in elections has been focused on the internet and global social media platforms. Literature on societal and media trust has also grown in recent years. Yet, disinformation is not limited to global platforms or the internet, traditional media outlets in many European countries act as vehicles of disinformation often under the direction of the government. Moreover, the connection between trust and resilience to disinformation has been less discussed. This article is aimed at tackling the question of what makes a country vulnerable to or resilient against online disinformation. It argues that a society's information resilience can be viewed as a combination of structural characteristics, features of its knowledge-distribution institutions including its media system, and the activities and capabilities of its citizens. The article makes this argument by describing these dimensions in four European case countries, based on comparable statistics and document analyses. The results indicate that European-wide strategies do not uniformly strengthen national resilience against disinformation and that anti-disinformation strategies need to be anchored in targeted assessments of the state of information resilience at the national level to be more effective. Such assessments are central, particularly to understanding citizens' information needs in key democratic events such as elections.

Seasonal changes in ovarian state in a eusocial halictine bee,Lasioglossum duplex, based on stages of the oldest oocytes in each ovariole (Hymenoptera: Halictidae)

Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism

Source-credibility information and social norms improve truth discernment and reduce engagement with misinformation online

Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation

Don't believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation

Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation

Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents

The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility

Separating truth from lies: comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands

Measuring receptivity to misinformation at scale on a social media platform

How can we combat online misinformation? A systematic overview of current interventions and their efficacy

A Comparative Evaluation of Interventions Against Misinformation: Augmenting the WHO Checklist

Psychological interventions countering misinformation in social media: A scoping review

Softly empowering a prosocial expert in the family: lasting effects of a counter-misinformation intervention in an informational autocracy

Misinformation interventions decay rapidly without an immediate posttest

Whom to trust? Media exposure patterns of citizens with perceptions of misinformation and disinformation related to the news media

A Mild Approach to Prebunking Health Misinformation in Social Media: Digital Nudging

The Misleading count: an identity-based intervention to counter partisan misinformation sharing

Determinants of Gullibility to Misinformation: A Study of Climate Change, COVID-19 and Artificial Intelligence

"I don't trust them": Exploring Perceptions of Fact-checking Entities for Flagging Online Misinformation

Beyond online disinformation: assessing national information resilience in four European countries