Abstract:Open science (OS) awareness and skills are increasingly becoming an essential part of everyday scientific work as e.g., many journals require authors to share data. However, following an OS workflow can seem challenging at first. Thus, instructions by journals and other guidelines are important. But how comprehensive are they in the field of ecology and evolutionary biology (Ecol Evol)? To find this out, we reviewed 20 published OS guideline articles aimed for ecologists or evolutionary biologists, together with the data policies of 17 Ecol Evol journals to chart the current landscape of OS guidelines in the field, find potential gaps, identify field-specific barriers for OS and discuss solutions to overcome these challenges. We found that many of the guideline articles covered similar topics, despite being written for a narrow field or specific target audience. Likewise, many of the guideline articles mentioned similar obstacles that could hinder or postpone a transition to open data sharing. Thus, there could be a need for a more widely known, general OS guideline for Ecol Evol. Following the same guideline could also enhance the uniformity of the OS practices carried on in the field. However, some topics, like long-term experiments and physical samples, were mentioned surprisingly seldom, although they are typical issues in Ecol Evol. Of the journals, 15 out of 17 expected or at least encouraged data sharing either for all articles or under specific conditions, e.g. for registered reports and 10 of those required data sharing at the submission phase. The coverage of journal data policies varied greatly between journals, from practically non-existing to very extensive. As journals can contribute greatly by leading the way and making open data useful, we recommend that the publishers and journals would invest in clear and comprehensive data policies and instructions for authors.

Supporting open science at PLOS Biology

The role of Open Science in our research

Onwards! Open science and the (PLOS) genetics community

Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

Open access is shaping scientific communication

How open science helps researchers succeed

Serving the scientific community: FEBS Open Bio in 2024

A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science

Promoting an open research culture

PLOS Pathogens expanding horizons

Investing in Open Science: Key Considerations for Funders

Synthesis of nickel complexes with bidentate N,O-type ligands and application in the catalytic oligomerization of ethylene.

Publishing Biomedical Research: a rapidly evolving ecosystem

The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open Data Means Better Science

Accelerating the open research agenda to solve global challenges

Are Open Science instructions targeted to ecologists and evolutionary biologists sufficient? A literature review of guidelines and journal data policies

Hits and misses in the last decade of open science: Researchers from different subfields and career stages offer personal reflections and suggestions

Open science practices among authors published in complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: An international, cross-sectional survey

The PLOS ONE Synthetic Biology Collection: Six Years and Counting

Open Science in Software Engineering

What Does Open Peer Review Bring to Scientific Articles? Evidence from PLoS Journals