Open science practices among authors published in complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine journals: An international, cross-sectional survey
Jeremy Y. Ng,Brenda X. Lin,Liliane Kreuder,Holger Cramer,David Moher
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040259
IF: 1.6
2024-11-06
Medicine
Abstract:In an era where knowledge is abundant but not necessarily available, the emerging open science movement is a critical step towards accessible and transparent science. Open science aims to increase research availability and reach across different audiences through open data, open access platforms, transparent peer review methods, and public access. [ 1–6 ] Specifically, the movement seeks to increase the amount of science research that is accurately being disseminated to the public as well as trust in science. Prior to the open science movement, access to research data was more limited, had inadequate reporting guidelines, and lacked reproducibility. [ 7 , 8 ] Many measures have been taken to increase study data availability, allowing for improved data assessment and transparency. [ 8–10 ] For example, tools such as the Open Science Framework (OSF) have been created for use as a centralized platform for open workflow throughout the research process. [ 2 , 11 ] These measures allow researchers to better understand, modify, verify, and replicate study data. [ 2 , 12 , 13 ] In addition, open data encourages the reuse of existing data to avoid redundancy in scientific literature. [ 14 ] A crucial part of open science includes open access publishing, which enables research to be more freely communicated with the public. The term "open access" encompasses different materials such as preprints, open access journals, and post-prints, all of which allow more equitable access to scientific information. [ 9 , 10 , 15 ] Although "closed access" journals still exist, many have now adapted to varying degrees of open access publishing models. [ 10 ]
medicine, general & internal