Abstract:The article unpacks the publishing practices and focuses on the curating work carried out by the editors of chemistry journals. Based on a qualitative analysis of multiple sources in two publishing houses (the American Chemical Society, ACS and Nature Research), it first shows that the role of editor-in-chief covers a wide range of realities and is far from being limited to that of a gatekeeper (the most common metaphor in the literature). In journals that are part of the Nature Research portfolio, in-house editors, who are no longer active scientists, work full time for the journals. The article describes the professional trajectories and skills required to join the publishing house. Interviews highlight collective identity-based actions, attention to the growth and the flow of manuscripts, but also specific epistemic properties of outputs in chemistry. Besides tasks that editors outline “as really the same as they were 100 years ago,” as they spend most of their time handling manuscripts and providing quality assurance, they also travel to conferences to support journals and encourage submissions, visit labs where researchers pitch their work or ask questions about journals, and “educate the actors themselves” about new fields. In both cases studied, the publishing houses partner with institutions to offer events (ACS on Campus programme, Nature masterclass) that a university or department can freely host or buy, where editors organize workshops on all aspects of manuscript preparation. Second, publishing houses, whether non-for-profit or commercial, have embraced a catalog logic, where the journals are not necessarily in competition and have an assumed place and hierarchy. At Nature Research, editors-in-chief head business units inscribed in the company's organization. Despite standardized processes imposed by the procedural chain, there is still room to maneuver in these relatively autonomous structures that are ultimately evaluated on their results (the annual production of a certain number of high-quality papers). On the other hand, ACS is seen as a vessel whose course cannot easily be deviated. The conclusion calls for extending this type of investigation to other contexts or types of journals.

Onwards! Open science and the (PLOS) genetics community

Supporting open science at PLOS Biology

PLOS Pathogens expanding horizons

Toward the Future: Perspectives on the Impacts of Genetic Testing and Biomarkers on Advancing Health Care

On the Fast Track to Full Gold Open Access

Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond

Can scientists and their institutions become their own open access publishers?

New directions for the Journal of Health Psychology

The changing roles of scientific journals

Publishing Biomedical Research: a rapidly evolving ecosystem

Renewing an author‐centric publication process

Pioneering research has a new home in a trusted place

Serving the scientific community: FEBS Open Bio in 2024

A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science

Celebrating a body of work

The role of Open Science in our research

From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond

Open access is shaping scientific communication

Opening Up of Editorial Activities at Chemistry Journals. What Does Editorship Mean and What Does It Involve?

The Landscape of Publishing in Neuroscience: Honouring Our Scientific Heritage and Shaping the Future of Research

Envisioning the scientific paper of the future